The market should already be “pulling” for what you’re building; the demand should already exist.
It feels like the market is pulling you (as opposed to you trying to pull the market over to your product).
People almost always buy products in categories they're familiar with.
April has a good thread on this:
- Changes in price or supply for related goods
- Government policy, investment, R&D
- The ubiquity of related technologies
- Evolving societal trends and tastes
- Evolution in a product category
- Rising (or falling) incomes
- Economic cycles
This makes sense! Customer demand increases, entrepreneurs respond to that demand by supplying a solution.
For example, Airbnb hosts respond to demand; they don't create it.
Ref: forbes.com/sites/hbsworki…
Because they can’t define the size and shape of demand! That’s my point.
There were pre-existing market conditions in the smartphone market that Apple benefitted from.
- What kinds of things customers want
- How bad they want them
- Global supply
But we have almost zero influence over:
- How many customers there are
- How much they can spend
- What their alternatives are
- Socio-political trends
- CAC doesn’t matter as long as user base is growing
- They can undercut market prices (and lose money)
- Often, they ignore gov regulations
It looks like they’re creating demand, but it doesn’t last.
"Ultimately, your product's potential is determined by the size, momentum, and characteristics of your market."
justinjackson.ca/surfing