Color me suspicious but on the same day we find reporting that Putin is trying to help Bernie Sanders, we find that people working caucus sites in NV are being required to sign NDA's. Obviously, opponents hope that the Russia information will suppress the Sanders' vote but...
...more importantly, it will provide cover if we see an 30 or 40 point turn around from recent polling. It leaves open the opportunity for NV to quash the actual vote, blame it on the report about Russia while their poll workers are sworn to secrecy about what the see go on.
Anyone operating in good faith has got to see what kind of set up this is. We're talking about NV that screwed the process from start to finish in 2016 and wants to do it again. There were 2 reasons NV had to go for Clinton in 2016 by any means necessary. Well, actually, 3...
In a scenario with big deja vue, Bernie Sanders was coming into NV having tied Clinton in Iowa and won New Hampshire meaning he had momentum. NV was, also the first state voting with any racial/cultural diversity. The first 2 reasons NV was a 'most lose' for Sanders were 1/ they
...could not allow him to gain more momentum. 2/they could not allow him to win a state with a large minority population as it would have destroyed their 'bro' narrative which they are now recycling, and 3/ is a reason we just learned from @danrolle a week or so ago: Clinton's
@danrolle ...campaign was told by donors that if she did not 'win' NV, the money would cease coming. Once again, we are living in Ground Hog's Day.
@danrolle I'm only slightly concerned Bernie's vote will be suppressed by a late day smear. My bigger concern is they will cheat on vote counting and let it look as if the 'new' Russia information explains and impossible turn around from recent polling. They've also been laying the...
@danrolle ...ground work for this by reporting for a few weeks that "NV is notoriously hard to poll," thereby providing cover for a vote cheat that looks very skewed.
@threadreaderapp unroll
