Highly recommend studying cultures were women have historically held power, to understand use of power
I found this extremely informative, both on power & for my own cultural roots
m.startribune.com/daughters-kept…
That can mean your university or company network, even religious group. For instance, Dr. Birx is evangelical as are current health advisors
khn.org/news/religious…
But final cut: usually “in group” gets in + staying power
“Group” can be defined in various ways. Options for me: #publichealth, #pediatrician, #communityhealth etc.
Know which groups have internal competition & dysfunction (Doctors, Academics)
Determines your ability to deliver on your “mandate” or expand past it
for your agenda
once you are “in”
What were you let in/hired to do?
&
Will you be allowed to do it?
Title is not what gives you power - many women miss this point
+ #glasscliff
means limited resources
-less 💰
-high anxiety (low emotional resources)
all of that limits your ability to achieve your agenda
you might be caught simply in putting out fires... or an inferno
+ bumping egos
If you have a mandate to change things expect a lot of pushback
researchgate.net/publication/32…
Even if you are higher in the hierarchy you may lack:
-trust
-depth of connection
-understanding group
-cultural nuance
-internal & external politics
-allies
-knowledge of how others respond
So tread carefully
*actually have*
A thread on all the ways women are resented or not allowed to use their actual power - even when founder of own company!
If former slaves were full citizens and could vote
Then daughters & wives could be counted on vote with white men
= tribalism
Thread:
invoke “protection” vs a “scary” black male
Savvy use of indirect power when asked to follow rules
She invoked “damsel in distress” vs race/gender stereotypes
Threat? likely an ego threat
forbes.com/sites/terinaal…
this type of female power is quickly being “outed”
Manipulating optics & biases was never the right thing to do
...but now it will damage careers & reputations if one is revealed to be inauthentic
insidehighered.com/advice/2019/08…
The question is, can one make a difference in this kind of a role?
You access power of the system. Isn’t it just policing others according to rules of a broken system?
Yes/no
law.com/corpcounsel/20…
Sometimes that position can help you ensure somebody (towards whom there are unfair biases) can get a fair shake
Or incrementally change rules from the inside
What is your mandate?
You have to assess:
-scope of your role
-buy in that you have
-alignment around you
-who will oppose you
-whether the opposition will be overt or subversive
-working within rules or re-writing them
etc
I see a lot of mission driven folks get:
-puritanical about people (good vs bad)
-tribal (us vs them)
-rigid on processes
that can block or exclude too many potential allies & reduce own impact
Not “approval”
Collaborate
“This idea of purity and you’re never compromised..You should get over that quickly..
..The world is messy; there are ambiguities. People who do really good stuff have flaws”
nytimes.com/2019/10/31/us/…
System is flawed, though
Might use the “call out” approach but sparingly
Always be accurate. Don’t spread rumors else harm own credibility
Better to access power through allies and coalition
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
/Fin