The ICMR DG and some other experts have argued that phase 1 and phase 2 data is enough for restricted emergency use approvals, and that phase 3 efficacy data is not necessarily required.
Dr T Jacob John also makes an argument in this regard, though also clarifying that there might have been some early safety data from those vaccinated in the phase 3 which is ongoing as well
BUT if we were going to base a regulatory decision on just phase1 and phase2 data, why did we have to wait till 02nd Jan 2021. That data was available a few weeks earlier, and in fact was considered in the 09th December CDSCO SEC meeting. Why not take the decision then itself?
why was the SEC continuing to ask for efficacy data on 09th Dec, 30th Dec, 01st Jan and then suddenly decided they did not need it on 02nd Jan? #transparency#regulation#COVID19#vaccines
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Have been in touch with Rachna for the last few weeks as we discussed issues with one of the #Bhopal#clinicaltrials site for #Covaxin. Lots of issues with trial conduct as documented in her thread below.
Issues with informed consent, care of trial participants, recruitment.
This issue needs to be highlighted more as it shows us what poor oversight could mean, especially because we are now talking about expanded use of vaccines "in clinical trials mode" (not that I am sure anyone really knows what that means)
Now this is probably just an issue with an inexperienced trial site and investigators who were eager to be part of a prestigious study, but faltered on some aspects of trial conduct. But imagine this happening at scale-- how are we going to ensure protection of the vaccinees?
The 1st Prof MK Bhan Memorial lecture has started live streaming
Please watch at
The Lecture will be delivered by Prof. Vinod K Paul @NITIAayog on topic 'Science & Art of Influencing Health at Transnational Scale: How Visionary Physician Scientists Do it'
Dr @RenuSwarup also announces the launch of a #Fellowship Program to encourage young #researchers to continue their postdoctoral research in India.
The MKB-YRFP scheme @DBTIndia
Dear @PrinSciAdvGoI@PrinSciAdvOff, the issue of recent FCRA amendments on international collaborative #science#health#research needs to be urgently taken up. Lot of uncertainty.
a) sub-agreements now not allowed which impact existing scientific collaborations b/w institutions
b) Interpretations seem to indicate remittance back of FCRA funds will not be allowed. Funders have rules any unspent funds at end of project cycle have to be sent back. But it might not be possible now?
c) Coupled with the #HMSC clearance housed at @ICMRDELHI which is still running delayed with long time for processing even for #COVID19 related #research proposals, this is going to stymie internationally funded collaborative research, often obtained through competitive grants
I am worried that many of us are afraid of speaking truth to power. That scientists, many of them excellent, within our national research bodies would not call out outrageous statements and lack of evidence based steps defies me. Isn't that a basic scientist quality?
Are we so afraid of upsetting status quo, our bosses who might have erred, that we would be willing to let the institution and its credibility be marred? Does that not hurt us at some basic level. Does that not trouble you when you reflect on what it means for Indian Science?
I know many of you are being asked questions in emails, phone calls and whatsapp groups and struggling to respond. We hope you will find the strength to rescue the institutions you represent from losing their sheen. Remember credibility takes ages to build, but easy to lose it.
This is a letter which has been sent out by the ICMR DG yesterday. Now that multiple folks have confirmed genuineness, let me raise some issues with this letter on #vaccine#trials during a pandemic, in this case #COVID19
What are the ethical issues in this letter? Read on.
For a vaccine for which pre-clinical development is still ongoing, as per the letter itself, how can clinical trial recruitment be starting on 07th July?
And that the vaccine will be launched on 15th August? A vaccine trial completed in little over a month, efficacy pre-decided?
How were the clinical trial sites mentioned in the appendix chosen--on what criteria? eligibility? From what list? was this selection done by ICMR or by BBIL? Some of these seem to be small nursing homes/hospitals- are they the apt place to run a pandemic #vaccine trial?
Statement issued by the Ministry of Ayush on claims of Patanjali Ayurved regarding treatment of COVID-19
Related to this, the only information available in the public domain is this CTRI registration ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials…
This trial was registered on CTRI on 20 May 2020, sponsored by Patanjali.
Trial conducted at National Institute of Medical Sciences Jaipur nationalinstituteofmedicalsciences.com
Seemingly a private medical college in Jaipur
Apparently approved by the local IEC