Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #trials

Most recents (3)

1) The beginning of the ending. That is my description concerning the end of the Mueller “witch hunt”. Many-hours wasted, tax dollars wasted, lives destroyed.

Mueller's Report Ends 'WitchHunt' But What's About To Unfold Is The Real Story - Sara A. Carter saraacarter.com/muellers-repor…
2) Accusations from the #leftistmedia and deep state politicians constantly pounding the narrative that @POTUS worked with the Russians in a spy campaign. All a total fabrication, a made up storyline to try and destroy an innocent man who loves America and wants the US to heal.
3) “BARR said Trump never broke any laws”. NONE.
He’s innocent of any and all accusations made of him.
Many people would break under the stress of all the lies, misinformation and smear of himself, family, and associates. But @POTUS knows who he is and the work he must do.
Read 16 tweets
1a. Feb 18 QAnon [not in order]: AG Barr Questions Mueller & Rosenstein about Russia Investigation.

📁
Do you believe in coincidences?
Kitchen is HOT.
Q

#News #Trump #Qanon @realDonaldTrump #WWG1WGA
#YouAreTheNews #GreatAwakening #PainComing #SpyGate
1b. Feb 18 QAnon: Q LINK:

AG Barr Questions Mueller & Rosenstein about Russia Investigation.

📁

Do you believe in coincidences?
Kitchen is HOT.
Q

#News #Trump #Qanon @realDonaldTrump #WWG1WGA
#YouAreTheNews #GreatAwakening #PainComing #SpyGate
2. Feb 18 Qanon to Anon >>5237651

Dead cat bounce.

Nothing can stop this.

Q

#News #Trump #Qanon @realDonaldTrump #WWG1WGA #YouAreTheNews
#GreatAwakening #PainComing #TheStormIsUponUs #SpyGate
Read 33 tweets
Randomization never ensures zero #confounding bias. It provides probabilistic bounds on confounding.

Therefore, by bad luck, the effect estimates from some perfectly conducted randomized #trials are substantially confounded. But we don't know which ones!

An eye-opening example:
In Denmark, 860 individuals were randomly allocated to either "intervention" or "control":
• No intervention was implemented
• Individuals were unaware of their allocation
• Mortality was higher in the intervention group with p=0.003

Keep this in mind when evaluating a trial.
Reference:
Vass M (PhD Thesis). Prevention of functional decline in older people. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen 2010, p.120.

Thanks to Mikkel Zöllner Ankarfeldt for bringing this example to my attention.
Read 7 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!