I am ALL for 1st amendment. Am anti-policing. Am anti-censorship.
Those of us in #SciComm can hold our OWN selves to higher standards than I see on #MedTwitter now. Vet. Verify. Be factual. Don’t do “left” vs “right.”
We cannot control what others post or do with our own posts to mislabel or misuse, unfortunately. We can reduce the “gotcha” aspects w/ passing things thru several gates. For me, having worked in the ED, been a public official, served as an expert witness, have automatic filters.
Deleting is NO protection. There is legal precedent “cleaning up” social media can lead to more questions.
It has been screenshotted. The “blocked!” or “deleted!” is used for innuendo.
Long thread on compliance & legal aspects of #SciComm for licensed professionals.
I worked in #Medicaid for 3 years & as #FQHC CMO & VP of Medical Affairs to expand access, improve maternal child #health. Part of job: compliance, oversight, discipline clinicians. I hate saying “don’t” but am sharing on what basis I signed/testified to to remove credentials.
As we saw yesterday, elected officials, even those in the highest office of the land, do not get held to standards. Many spew conspiracies without verified facts.
It makes it very difficult to do good #SciComm, especially for #publichealth. Science & politics conflated.
Please focus on verified facts and standards
Do not outsource your critical thinking to anyone else. Another person you agree with/similar to you may be wrong, biased, using outdated/debunked information
If you are unsure, don’t reshare
Credibility, being factual, is critical
If you take any appointed or employed role in #publichealth, have to guard your integrity carefully. At the top tier: often an elected official. Be known for your reliability, fairness, #ethics. Personally, am grateful I had good role models including hsph.harvard.edu/ecpe/faculty/c…
I had to be VERY careful in that role and when on board of MA @AmerAcadPeds not to speak in left/right, GOP/Dem terms. Be SPECIFIC in your communication if you seek accountability from elected officials and candidates. Let’s do what we can to counter growing anti-science biases.
I find something positive WHILE saying I do not agree in this #podcast with @Ned_Arick. “Even a broken clock is right twice a day” helps me with this framing
Rural hospitals are closing
Public education gutted
Rising income inequality
Historical harms & structures of inequity still in place
People are hurting
“Snarks” feel good in the moment but alienate
+ reinforce elitism reputation
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I mean, before the pandemic, at a fancy schmancy MBA event in NYC, I literally put two cider donuts, wrapped in napkins, in my purse. After you have subsisted on a steady diet of hospital saltines, peanut butter, & graham crackers, one becomes shameless.
Also: child of immigrants
Today I feel calm & resolute because I had been waiting for this. Back in 2016, given what I had been seeing in the run up to the election and nasty campaign language inciting hatefulness, was having an uptick in anxiety. Plus this: masslive.com/boston/2020/01…
NOW others see it too.
When that news broke of SCHOOLS sharing information with authorities to ARREST CHILDREN
+
my most recent conversation in the hospital in my last shift, a nurse had made remarks about race & who commits violence
=
I got a massive migraine & nausea. themuse.com/advice/structu…
My revulsion/aversion to stepping foot into work was
-fear of complicity
-inability to protect my patients or other staff from harm
-risks to my career
“Warnock will be the first Black senator from Georgia and, as the New York Times’ Jamelle Bouie pointed out on Twitter, only the second Black senator elected from the South since Reconstruction.”
Darn it. Why do I live in overcivilized quiet Boston & not still in #NewYorkCity? Right now everybody would be on the rooftops banging pots & pans, blaring music, waving at neighbors they don’t know. Miss this.
It’s taken me years, but am finally learning how to not get sucked into imbalanced situations. Much of life was a “pleaser”, then a service profession surrounded by anxious parents. Yes, my work has often been on caring for vulnerable, voiceless, abused. Now I focus on systems.
I’ve always had a range of friendships, balanced and not so much. Often, I (am made to) feel like I have excessive privilege compared to someone else who had experienced various types of abuse and harm - tho, in fact tending to others can be a way to avoid processing own stuff.
I am not here to fix anyone else. We can support each other to find own way. When you become direct, especially in female friendships, may become more of an introvert 😂
I find women, often are so depleted & traumatized they want “safe spaces” and validation.
I do miss this tbh. Once in East Boston, I was seeing a Latina tween with headaches that only happened Sunday nights. Turns out she was being bullied at school. I wrote a letter to her school to investigate the bullying. Loved she saw a woman who looked like her have authority.
When you see your doctor listens, takes the time, believes you, uses her authority & credentials to make the system work for you, you start to feel safer & begin to trust, then may begin to listen. It is easy to write off “the system.” As much as I rail against, I work within it.
Our tax dollars pay for #publichealth and other resources. If only those who historically benefit from the system engage, that reinforces disparities.
Some people will try to tell you that only black and brown people are on public assistance but that is not true.