According to Zhang at least, it means the #EU “breaking away from US control and gaining the power to make strategic decisions on its own.”
1⃣ “The crisis in #Ukraine has rendered the already unpromising prospects of the EU's strategic autonomy even bleaker.”
2⃣ “In the field of defence, the EU's aspiration [意愿] for strategic autonomy has clearly declined. Central and Eastern European countries, especially #Poland and the Baltic states, have become more dependent on the United States and #NATO."
3⃣ “Most of the increased military spending by European countries is still likely to go to the #US rather than European countries’ [own] military industries ... This is clearly not a good sign for [🇪🇺] strategic autonomy."
4⃣ "In the economic sphere, the EU's capacity for strategic autonomy is also trending downwards in the long term ... The economic disparity between the EU and the #USA is widening ... [and] the economic relationship between the US and Europe will become [increasingly] unequal.”
🪧 Zhang also highlights the EU’s loss of the 🇷🇺 market, the weakening of the euro and 🇪🇺's growing dependence on 🇺🇸 gas as further increasing the EU’s dependence on the US. He worries that rifts in the 🇫🇷-🇩🇪 relationship may also hamper the EU’s push towards strategic autonomy.
5⃣"At present, the voices of the CEE and Nordic countries in the EU have become significantly louder. Their political stance, such as being pro-US and anti-#Russia is becoming the mainstream in the #EuropeanUnion ->
-> As long as the crisis in #Ukraine continues and the confrontation between Europe and Russia remains unchanged, the hard-line policies of the CEE and Nordic countries will remain the prevailing EU policy towards #Russia."
6⃣ "The #UnitedStates and #NATO will therefore continue to guide the EU’s foreign and security policies, thus making it difficult for the EU's idea of strategic autonomy to become the mainstream.”
🪧 Zhang sees #France and #Germany as having a more pragmatic stance towards Russia but unable to impose their views due to “political correctness” (政治正确).
7⃣"It will be very difficult for the EU to commit [proper] resources and project power both globally and in the so-called ‘Indo-Pacific’ region as an independent force."
8⃣"Although the EU has launched its own #IndoPacific strategy, this increasingly important region will be largely relegated to being a bargaining chip [for the EU in its relationship] with the US."
🔹For more on this and other topics as viewed by Chinese scholars and think-tank analysts, subscribe for free:
How is the #UkraineRussiaWar affecting the #EU's prospects? Its economy? Its place in the world?
▫️ Zhang Jian (张健): "It will further weaken the 🇪🇺's strength and int. influence and accelerate its marginalisation in the global geopolitical landscape."
🔹The author: Zhang Jian (张健) is the director of the Institute of European Studies at China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR) – an influential think tank linked to China’s Ministry of State Security.
🔹Some context: Zhang’s assessment is more pessimistic than some in China, but several of his arguments are in line with those made by other Chinese analysts: e.g. the negative impact that the #war has had on the EU’s quest for #StrategicAutonomy. This is bad news for #China.
🔹About the author: Ye Yan (叶研) is currently a senior economist at the international R&D arm of China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and an adjunct professor at China’s Southwest University of Political Science & Law.
🔹Some background: China was taken aback by the scale of Western sanctions on Russia following the outbreak of the #UkraineWar. Government officials and experts have since been assessing how best to protect their country from such a doomsday scenario.
🔹The author: Yang is the head of the highly regarded Beijing Cultural Review (BCR). He is also the director of the Longway Foundation which publishes BCR. The foundation describes its publication as “the most influential magazine of intellectual thought and commentary in China”.
▫️ Yang’s views in a nutshell:
1⃣ “Capitalist politics” are no longer in line with “capitalist economics”. The former now undermines globalisation, while the latter supports it.
🪧 Remember #XiJinping encouraging #CCP members/diplomats to show a “fighting spirit" and his repeated emphasis on "being good at struggling"?
What this implies is still being debated in #China.
Below is a 'moderate' take by one of China’s most respected US specialists:
🧵🧵🧵
🔹 Da Wei (达巍) is a professor of international relations at Tsinghua University and the director of its prestigious Centre for International Security and Strategy (CISS).
▫️ “The 20th Party Congress demanded that the whole of the Party ‘carry forward its fighting/struggling spirit’ ... It is important to stress that the #communist emphasis on struggle is a #Marxist philosophical concept & must be distinguished from the struggle of everyday life.”
▫️ “When it comes to international political risks, the US's domestic problems have to be placed at the top of the list ... the US’s internal divisions produce huge externalities that have far-reaching effects on world politics.”
▫️ "So, will a transfer [of the US’s domestic tensions] occur at the military level? This is even more worrying. Countries must guard themselves against this [各国不可不防]."
"#RishiSunak has now become the representative of 🇬🇧's hardliners on #China. We cannot expect him to become a moderate on China again after becoming PM."
🔹 Author: Xu Ruike (徐瑞珂) – Prof. at Beijing Foreign Studies University.
▫️ "Under Sunak, the 'Americanisation' of Britain's China policy will remain evident ... Economics will take a back seat. Suspicion and hostility towards China will gradually become the defining theme of Sino-British relations."
▫️ "The right-wing forces of the Conservative backbenchers represented by @aliciakearns and @MPIainDS will exert significant influence on Downing Street's China policy."