This isn’t a classic chemical spill. Officials set hazardous chemicals -on fire- likely creating 100s-1000s of other materials.
You have to throw the kitchen sink at the chemical screening /identification problem. They have not done that, yet.
Officials must course correct.
When you review the county drinking water well testing data they didn’t test for a number of the chemicals in the creek.
So, what was the purpose of testing? Spending that $? Telling residents water is safe?
Why did these agencies choose not to be thorough in their approach?
The post-disaster haphazard water testing approach used in #Ohio isn’t new (we’ve seen it elsewhere in the US).
But what is clear is that officials are not applying the most thorough approach in Ohio. Officials set the chemicals on fire. They should characterize consequences.
Post-disaster we often see different agencies look for different chemicals based on their own perspectives. When you have air/water/soil disasters you need a science team running point.
That’s not what’s happening.
It’s never to late to do the right thing.
Course correct.
One last point...
Sometimes you hear officials say they're using "indicator chemicals".
This is sometimes code for when they don't know what specifically they should look for so people decide to just look for X, Y, Z.
They should be re-evaluating and course correcting.
We saw this in CA after the #CampFire. The state of said benzene was THE indicator chemical for post wildfire contamination. (Their own data showed it wasn’t). In 2020 wildfires I Oregon showed it wasn’t too.
This claim was issued to save the state $, not protect public health.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thanks to Prof. @GuillermoRein@ImperialHazelab and everyone for organizing and participating in the seminar. I truly learned a lot. Some really brilliant and insightful researchers here in working on global building #fire and #wildfire challenges.
I even got to see aluminum composite burn, a material examined after the #GrenfellTowerFire.
I'm running on 4 hours sleep, but felt it was important to get this to OSHA ASAP.
FYI @smartunionworks, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, @BMWEDIBT, @BLET, Brotherhood Railway Carmen, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, @IBEW, @TCUnionHQ, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, @transportworker
My perspective provided below. There's still time to fix a bad bill and protect Indiana's children. 1/
2/ The current bill requires #preschool and #childcare facilities to conduct drinking water testing for lead. If lead "equals or exceeds 15 parts per billion" (ppb), they must reduce the lead levels.
Testing = Good
15 ppb lead = Bad
3/ What do the experts say?
Well, the @AmerAcadPeds (doctors dedicated to the health, safety and well-being of infants, children, adolescents and young adults says lead no greater than 1 ppb. (These are doctors who know #children's health)
Wow. Water utility district meeting update about #CZULightningComplex fire. Question 1: Is it safe for chemical absorption through skin? Utility says Waterboard would only allow Do Not Drink-Do Not Use order. We recommended Do Not Use order based on #TubbsFire and #CampFire
Yes, a DNU order should have been issued b/c no one understands if hazardous waste scale water contam. is present. Bathing in hazardous waste level water is NOT acceptable. Why did the Waterboard not allow the utility to issue a Do Not Use order? Utility needs to change to a DNU.
More questions about if people can people wash dishes? - my answer: No.