On NI/IRL, here are some key points and a bit of tweet-tight analysis: (1/)
Failing that, UK will propose ‘specific solutions’.
If those fail? UK to maintain’ full alignment’ w/ relevant SM & CU rules (2/
Safest bet would be on specific solutions (AKA ‘flexible & imaginative’?) for NI. This is confirmed by para 50. (3/
*unless* ‘consistent with the 1998 Agmt, the NI Executive & Assembly agree that distinct arrangements are appropriate for NI.’
This gives devolved admin power to choose specific solutions for NI. Clever. (4/
This = critical to reassuring EU26. See Para 51. ‘establish mechanisms to ensure the implementation & oversight of any specific arrangement to safeguard' integrity of SM & CU (5/
Para 43. Wishes to avoid ‘related checks & controls’.
IMO If UK not to breach WTO rules, it will need thus to avoid the conditions that require such controls. (6/
Plus para 44 'NI's position as an integral part of the UK, consistent with the principle of consent’. PM’s letter confirms this. tinyurl.com/y8y2o8vt (8/
Para 47: ‘Cooperation btnIRL & NI is a central part of the 1998 Agmt & is essential for achieving *reconciliation* & the normalisation of relationships on the island of Ireland.’
Roles, functions & safeguards of the NIExec, NIA & NSMC protected. (9/
Hence ‘regulatory alignment’ is more than a nice phrase, and will be interpreted as such by EU. (10/
No diminuition of rights & safeguards of citizens in NI (para 53).
Future PEACE & INTERREG hopeful (para 55).
Phase 2 will inc. ‘distinct strand’ on ‘the detailed arrangements' for NI/IRL (para 56)
(11/11)