1. OK, I just figured out what Peter Strzok meant by this message. He is referring to the September 2nd, 2016 FBI release and how he, and his colleagues, withheld specific information from the release. See --> 
2. You probably remember this, or it will jog your memory:
3. I wrote about it on September 2nd when the FBI released the documents, and we included all of the attached release information. See --> theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/02/fbi…
4. What FBI Agent Peter Strzok is admitting in that September 10th, 2016, text message to Lisa Page, is that he and Bill Priestap intentionally withheld the most damaging information from the FBI release of September 2nd, 2016. 
5. Put it all together, with the correct timeline and context, and the argument (current media narrative) that the DOJ/FBI small group was not specifically intending to protect Hillary Clinton entirely evaporates.
6. I think that's a pretty big deal because there's absolutely no retreat from that confirmation.
7. How about you? What do you think? Is that worth a.... 
8. Yea, me too. Essentially game over. There's no exit from that reality.
That is 100% concrete evidence the FBI was working to exonerate Clinton, and withholding evidence from release they admit was damning. The End.
[ps. I'll put it together in a single article for sharing]
That is 100% concrete evidence the FBI was working to exonerate Clinton, and withholding evidence from release they admit was damning. The End.
[ps. I'll put it together in a single article for sharing]
