The NDA government was "merely following" confidentiality provisions under an agreement signed between India and France in 2008 when the Congress-led UPA government was in power.
#Rafale4NatSecurity
1
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVpGuN4XUAAilx5.jpg)
#Rafale4NatSecurity
2
RS documents clearly indicate that both Pranab Mukherjee & AK Antony refused to release commercial details of deals when they were Defense Ministers
#Rafale4NatSecurity
3
Rahul asking for details is not in the interest of the country &will hamper national security
#Rafale4NatSecurity
4
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVpK43SWAAA3Xyh.jpg)
Afterall this is deal b/n Govts & not w/any brokers in b/n.
#Rafale4NatSecurity
5
Raising questions on Raffel deal Congress party is just playing a blame game card.
#Rafale4NatSecurity
6
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVpMKJVW4AIqPR3.jpg)
Technology may not be going to HAL, but it is coming to the Defence Research and&Development Organisation (DRDO)
#Rafale4NatSecurity
7
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVpMoRuX4AAaAMx.jpg)
Rafale deal at a much lower cost than negotiated by UPA.
36 Rafale are a substantial upgrade than UPA negotiating.
No date of delivery fixed in UPA deal.
#Rafale4NatSecurity
9
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVpNwWFXcAEk3Ra.jpg)
Can Cong complain if the exact cost is not being shared because of 2008 secrecy clause signed by UPA?
Share your views using the hashtag! #Rafale4NatSecurity
10/10
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVpOLhpWsAA5-fg.jpg)
#Rafale4NatSecurity
/
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVpZqPBXUAAYoi6.jpg)