This thread is about Common Sense vs the "University City Prosperity Project."
Below: FIU's Chief Financial Officer and President with a model of the bridge in September 2016.
panthernow.com/2016/09/19/new…
He & others have emphasized that the bridge was meant to save pedestrian lives, given the 6 lane highway it crosses.
Decision makers were seduced by peripheral factors.
$15m of fed tax money that "may" provide a hangout?
Nothing in particular, as it happens. This project was a wasteful socialist central planning build-it-and-they-will-come monstrosity that was all too common in DC under Obama.
Fine. Show me the data, how many pedestrian deaths there have been at this intersection in, say, the last 30 years.
I only know of one, which occurred years after the project began.
They got a nice fancy pedestrian bridge so why shouldn't we?
Source: miamiherald.com/news/local/com…
There are a few topographical sites where it's the best solution. Not here though.
generational Democrat elites with their snouts in the trough. LA, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Miami, Baltimore and NYC. Problems with sanitation, crime, poverty and so on.
If the political context hadn't been ripe for abuse, pedestrian safety at this site would have had a much better solution.
miamiherald.com/news/local/edu…
I'm not saying this solution would have been the best, I'm saying the evidence based calculations of objective independent engineers should have been respected.
Many have forgotten to run ideas through the Common Sense filter.
Sheriff (why isn't he fired yet?) Israel, Peter Whithall and Mark Rosenberg have some things in common.
Did they know? Yes.
END