So, what do we see?
The above makes it look like it halved, where it actually went from 255k (with a spike of 400k in November) to 135k on 1st of April.
More than half down. Both numbers wrong.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DaCANtqWAAA3L3c.jpg)
Roughtly increased 5x, as opposed to the 20x claimed by Ver.
All numbers wrong.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DaCAhyEXkAAUvKA.jpg)
An increase of ~7,5x, instead of the 15x claimed by Ver.
Numbers wrong.
An increase of 1,45x as opposed to the 5x claimed by Ver.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DaCB0K9XkAIGFEe.jpg)
Not sure how to measure the increase except in absolute numbers.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DaCCRkoXUAUs_OE.jpg)
A loss of more than 90%.
Not doing that, though as I am sticking to the method Ver used in his Tweet (though logically inconsistent)
~ 35% drop as opposed to Ver's 50%.
Wrong numbers.
What I object to is Ver making a bloody post with almost ALL data wrong to prove that it does have a right to exist.
It doesn't need a disingenuous person pushing it, as it already has a right to exist.