More Carpenter: Behold a list of theories of the Fourth Amendment that yesterday were merely wishful-thinking and today have become precedential Supreme Court reasoning, crediting the thinkers behind them: 1/
This opinion is all about the @KevinBankston/@ashk4n theory of government efficiency, which is built directly on Kerr's Equillibrium Adjustment theory and Surden's Structural Rights in Privacy. ashkansoltani.org/2014/01/09/the… 2/ 
So @Snowden got that right. 3/
This is also remarkable validation for Stephen Henderson's "Fourth Amendment Time Machines" theory, papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…, (a phrase which also got used in the ACLU's fantastic brief.) 4/
Another intellectual forebear is Justice Marshall, who argued in dissent in Smith v. Maryland that we should take the importance of the phone into account when deciding whether people should be held to assume the risk. Today, the Chief Justice agrees. 5/
Finally, I don't have one person to cite here, but to all of you who have argued that the Jones concurrences amounted to a "shadow majority", much to @OrinKerr's annoyance, it ain't a shadow no more. end/
