Before I answer that I want to address key points.
This is the strategy Mueller ad Rosentein have based the entire continuation of the Russia Investigation on.
He’s simply following proper procedures to prosecute based on THE SWORN EVIDENCE THAT WAS PRESENTED TO HIM.
But the DOJ must prove that the evidence was false! That’s what Horowitz is doing.
Trump did not Collude with Russia to influence the election in anyway. You can search the indictments so far from front to back and there is absolutely zero evidence of any collusion.
The only Russian Interference was a dozen trolls that sought to sew discord.
That is very bad for democrats because if that is the only Russian Meddling than that is truly not a reason to spy on another campaign or accuse the President of Collusion.
Gen Flynn did not lie in his interview to FBI agents based on evidence presented by IG Horowitz. He is clear and also did not collude in any way with Russia.
Manafort did not collude with Russia in anyway during the Campaign or to help the Campaign. However, he did receive payments while he was working with the Podesta Group years ago, to help advance a Pro-Russian adgenda in Ukraine, during the Obama Admin.
In conjunction with the next IG Report, what would happen if Mueller’s Final Conclusions looked similar to mine?
Mine were all based directly on evidence Mueller and Horowitz have presented so far mind you.
Think about the ramifications.
If you were tasked with writing Mueller’s Final Report based on the indictments and exculpatory evidence what would your conclusions be?
Are they different from mine?
Do they hurt Trump in the end?