Does @sjwrenlewis have any reflections on this Full Fact challenge on the DexEU Impact Assessment summaries? fullfact.org/europe/viral-i…
2/. I am concerned that none of us (including Full Facts) have access to the full impact assessments.
We cannot be sure of the underlying assumptions made in full, or the content of the data that formed the basis of the number crunching.
We cannot be sure of the underlying assumptions made in full, or the content of the data that formed the basis of the number crunching.
3/
To give an example, much talk went on about existing EU 3rd country Treaties “rolling over” to continue for us post Brexit.
There are 759 Treaties the EU has with 168 countries around the world that fascilitates trade to greater or lesser extents.
What assumptions were made?
To give an example, much talk went on about existing EU 3rd country Treaties “rolling over” to continue for us post Brexit.
There are 759 Treaties the EU has with 168 countries around the world that fascilitates trade to greater or lesser extents.
What assumptions were made?
@FullFact. Who was it that did your fact sheet calling the Brexit Impact Assessments misleading? (See thread below).
Did you, in fact, have access to the full unredacted reports and can you tell me what underlying assumptions the Govt required the economists to make?
Did you, in fact, have access to the full unredacted reports and can you tell me what underlying assumptions the Govt required the economists to make?
