Thread by @supergutman

.@skwawkbox has blocked me but just to make it clear, while it is now going round trying to clean up it's mess, pretending it endorsed a grossly antisemitic article by MISTAKE whilst tweeting about me, I'll explain what I'm attacking... THREAD 1/

Spreading fake news about Jews after the local elections where @skwawkbox despicably tried to prove that the Jewish community did the opposite of what they really did - just for Skwawkbox's own dirty political ends.

This is how you hold a people in contempt.

You lie about them.

You retweet an extreme antisemitic conspiracy theorist to whitewash real-life anti-Jewish racism in Labour. When you are shown (by several people) you are endorsing someone who spreads Neo-Nazi strength antisemitism you ignore them.

That is how you hold a people in contempt. 3/

You show a pathetic lack of understanding of Jews and antisemitism so claim that an extremist sect of ultra-orthodox Jews, who even stoop to giving an inverted Nazi salute, are not antisemitic because they're Jews.

And you never retract.

Because you hold Jews in contempt. 4/

Demanding of MP's who attended the #EnoughIsEnough demo that they explain which other minority groups they have spoken up for.

If that's what you are making people do if they oppose antisemitism then it can only be because you hold Jews in contempt. 5/,

When you accused MP's, inc. Jewish MP'S, of being "disengenious" or "colossaly ignorant" 'cos they demanded the suspension of someone who'd expunged the expulsion of a HOLOCUAST DENIER, then said, "MAKE THE WRECKERS SQUIRM FOR THEIR STUPIDITY" you showed real hatred for Jews. 6/

Heck, and then you tried to pin it on someone else! Nothing was beyond the pale for you... except of course reporting that at least THREE actual Holocaust deniers were selected to stand for Labour at the locals. An anti-racist blogger obviously couldn't stretch that far. 7/

Claimed that antisemitism has gone down under Corbyn by cherry-picking and misrepresenting stats which compare Labour *voters* to Labour *members* and this gets thrown back at Jews whenever they speak out against antisemitism.

You do this because you hold Jews in contempt. 8/

.@skwawkbox you use one tiny Jewish group (who have a leading member who says stuff like this) to subjegate the collective
Jewish experience of antisemitism -
another people's form of racism.

That's because you hold the vast VAST majority of Jews in nothing but contempt. 9/

So you share this vile, inciteful, antisemitic article - a call to arms against the Jews. It's what you believe. It encapsulates your output on antisemitism. It was no accident. I'd always give people a 2nd or even a 3rd chance but not you @skwawkbox

This is you.

Own it.

*And the next time you tweet me from behind a block @Skwawkbox I may be forced to say something unkind about you.

* And just to add, the pro-Corbyn commentariat, who claim to be opposed to antisemitism but who have been completely silent (when they know full well) about what Skwawkbox and The Canary have been doing to the British Jewish community are utterly complicit in this.

You don't oppose antisemitism in Labour if you don't publically speak out in the strongest possible terms against Skwawkbox and The Canary.

You can't hold both positions.

They are the worst possible advert for your political movement. /ENDS