U.S. SECRET SERVICE RESPONSE TO THE GUARDIAN REPORTNG
@drawandstrike @ThomasWictor @HNIJohnMiller @jihadaeon1 @rising_serpent @_ImperatorRex_ @Debradelai @LarrySchweikart
secretservice.gov/data/press/rel…
@drawandstrike @ThomasWictor @HNIJohnMiller @jihadaeon1 @rising_serpent @_ImperatorRex_ @Debradelai @LarrySchweikart
secretservice.gov/data/press/rel…
(Washington, D.C.) On Thursday, August 2, 2018, The Guardian published an article by Nick Hopkins entitled, Exclusive: suspected Russian spy found working at US embassy in Moscow. The article is wrought with irresponsible and inaccurate reporting based on the claims of...
“anonymous” sources. Prior to the Guardian publishing their article, the U.S. Secret Service provided their editor with our official statement as well as background information clearly refuting unfounded information.
It was specifically the duties of the Foreign Service National (FSN) position in Moscow to assist our attaches and agency by engaging the Russian government, including the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), the Russian Ministry of the Interior (MVD),
and the Russian Federal Protective Service (FPS) in furtherance of Secret Service interests. U.S. Secret Service interests overseas are twofold: Establish effective working relationships with foreign law enforcement partners in furtherance of...
successful protective visits in the host county and, to work with foreign law enforcement counterparts in furtherance of U.S. Secret Service criminal investigations initiated in the United States. The U.S. Secret Service recognizes that all FSNs who provide...
services in furtherance of our mission, administrative or otherwise, can be subjected to foreign intelligence influence. In Russia we explicitly expect FSNs to be subject to the influence or control of Russian Intelligence Services.
As such, all FSNs are managed accordingly to ensure that U.S. Secret Service and United States Government (USG) interests are protected at all times. As a result, the duties are limited to translation, interpretation, cultural guidance,
liaison and administrative support. In the article, Hopkins and The Guardian claim the “Russian is understood to have had full access to secret data during decade at embassy.” FSNs working under the direction of the U.S. Secret Service have never been...
provided or placed in a position to obtain, secret or classified information as erroneously reported. In mid-2017, U.S. State Department personnel, who manage the employment process and vet all FSNs,
advised the U.S. Secret Service the access authorization for a FSN working at the direction of the U.S. Secret Service, would not be extended following the completion of a scheduled security update.
The employee’s access to the Secret Service Moscow Resident Office was promptly discontinued. Reporting by the Guardian indicating the U.S. Secret Service failed to act on information provided by the U.S. State Department is categorically false.
Reports of the timing of the individual’s termination in question and the closing of the Secret Service Resident Office in Moscow correlate in any way are false. The U.S. Secret Service Moscow Resident Office closed in August of 2017 due to lack of cooperation from the...
Russian government -entirely unrelated to the termination of the FSN in question. Reports the Secret Service attempted to minimize or deliberately not disclose the U.S. State Department’s findings are categorically false.
Reporting and/or questions regarding a potential security “breach” of U.S. Secret Service systems, information or reporting is unfounded as FSNs work on, and support, only projects with the intent of providing and/or sharing the information with the Russian government...
in furtherance of Secret Service and USG interests. Regarding a post termination review and/or agency concerns regarding any reason for the termination,
it should be noted that the U.S. Secret Service is not an intelligence gathering agency and relies fully on the appropriate USG entities to pursue those avenues as determined appropriate.
