The next Zuckerberg was born in a poor family, never got into a good school and she now works in someone else's startup's kitchen.
The next Einstein died of a curable disease in a warn-torn country.
We limit humanity's progress by the percentage globally who can join innovating
The next Einstein died of a curable disease in a warn-torn country.
We limit humanity's progress by the percentage globally who can join innovating
The reason why i think this is unpopular:
It essentially means
- for every successful person there is a more talented person w/ a lesser chance
- most entrepreneurs fought hard on level easy
- we dont invest in the best but the lucky
- (in a way) there is no "self made man"
It essentially means
- for every successful person there is a more talented person w/ a lesser chance
- most entrepreneurs fought hard on level easy
- we dont invest in the best but the lucky
- (in a way) there is no "self made man"
Many people will read this as an appeal for "fairness" or "diversity for diversity's sake"
I see it differently:
The #1 lever for progress of humanity is how many people can join innovating.
At the moment this number is less than "a fraction of a fraction" of a percent.
I see it differently:
The #1 lever for progress of humanity is how many people can join innovating.
At the moment this number is less than "a fraction of a fraction" of a percent.
