OH FOR FUCK’S SAKE
Sequence of events:
1) Every major platform admits Infowars has repeatedly violated their Terms, but @jack says he didn’t violate Twitter’s Terms.
1) Every major platform admits Infowars has repeatedly violated their Terms, but @jack says he didn’t violate Twitter’s Terms.
2) Twitter claims the next day that much of the content that violated the Terms of other platforms would have violated their new policies, but they were tweeted BEFORE their policies changed.
3) @oliverdarcy finds tweets that included this same content that was tweeted AFTER their policies had changed and confronts Twitter about it. No response.
4) The tweets that did in fact violate the current Terms disappear from Twitter. Twitter denies they had anything to do with it. Jones later admits he did it to operate board (!!!).
5) Tonight, Twitter admits the tweets happened after the updated Terms, but Jones will be allowed to keep his account.
6) EVERYONE WONDERS WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE?? What is it, @jack? What are the Terms then? Can we all violate them whenever we want? Why is it so important to protect this scumbag that has made the lives of Sandy Hook parents so unnecessarily miserable?
*above board. Shit.
