,
4 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
-=[Thread]
Early Malikis always accepted Saheeh Al-Bukhari. Today, a foolish Maliki chucks the book away, because he finds some hadiths offensive.
Here is a list of complimentary works by 5th century Maliki scholars, who poured their hearts out to serve Saheeh Al-Bukhari.
1/4
Early Malikis always accepted Saheeh Al-Bukhari. Today, a foolish Maliki chucks the book away, because he finds some hadiths offensive.
Here is a list of complimentary works by 5th century Maliki scholars, who poured their hearts out to serve Saheeh Al-Bukhari.
1/4
Commentaries on Al-Bukhari:
Al-Dawi (d. 402)
Abu Al-Zinad (d. 422)
Al-Muhalab bin Abi Sufra (d. 433)
Al-Bawni (d. 440)
Ibn Battal (d. 449)
Al-Hawzani (d. 460)
Al-Tulaytili (d. 479)
Ibn Al-Murabit (d. 485)
Al-Jayyani (d. 486)
2/4
Al-Dawi (d. 402)
Abu Al-Zinad (d. 422)
Al-Muhalab bin Abi Sufra (d. 433)
Al-Bawni (d. 440)
Ibn Battal (d. 449)
Al-Hawzani (d. 460)
Al-Tulaytili (d. 479)
Ibn Al-Murabit (d. 485)
Al-Jayyani (d. 486)
2/4
Books on Ghareeb Al-Hadith:
Ibn Al-Sabooni (d. 423)
Ibn Hazm (d. 456)
Al-Humaidi (d. 488)
Works about the narrators of the Saheehain:
Ibn Rushaiq (d. 440)
Ibn Abdul Bar (d. 463)
Al-Baji (d. 474)
Al-Jayyani (d. 498)
Refer to Dr. Mohammad Al-Molaa’s paper on the subject. 3/4
Ibn Al-Sabooni (d. 423)
Ibn Hazm (d. 456)
Al-Humaidi (d. 488)
Works about the narrators of the Saheehain:
Ibn Rushaiq (d. 440)
Ibn Abdul Bar (d. 463)
Al-Baji (d. 474)
Al-Jayyani (d. 498)
Refer to Dr. Mohammad Al-Molaa’s paper on the subject. 3/4
Were all these early Maliki's gullible for accepting Saheeh Al-Bukhari? If they were aware of the "obvious" issues concerning its attribution, then why did they waste years of their lives serving the book?
The Maliki sect is free from @MuftiAbuLayth and his ilk.
4/4
The Maliki sect is free from @MuftiAbuLayth and his ilk.
4/4
