(1) People who see that Rod Rosenstein signed the final FISA renewal application often base their logical anger at Sir Rod on reports that omit a key fact. The fact missing from 99% of news stories that name him as a signatory fail to mention...
realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/…
realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/…
(2) That Sir Rod wasn’t the only person who signed that FISA renewal application. Also signing that application was Andrew McCabe. In missing that detail, people also don’t realize Sir Rod, as acting superior to the acting FBI director, would rely solely on McCabe’s word about...
(3) ...the accuracy of the information collected by people under McCabe’s leadership. People at Sir Rod’s level must rely upon trusted underlings. However, that doesn’t even mean Sir Rod has to trust McCabe to have a secondary reason for signing the application...
(4) There is no question McCabe was already under investigation in July 2017, which continued through background research to event prior to July 2017, and required ongoing surveillance months into 2018. Sir Rod would Know this ongoing nature of the monitoring of McCabe...
(5) Had Sir Rod refused to sign the McCabe FISA renewal application brought to him by McCabe, McCabe and the entire criminal organization would have been alerted that the DOJ truly knows everything, and evidence collection would effectively end upon that refusal to renew...
(6) Given the hell McCabe now faces and the Grand Jury empanelment for his crimes, I feel 95% or more confident that Sir Rod wouldn’t have signed that FISA renewal had the investigation of McCabe, et. al been completed...
(7) Reserve judgment folks. It’s far more likely Sir Rod is the white knight we all have hoped.
//End//
//End//
