Profile picture
Bansi Sharma @bansisharma
, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
Just 8 more witnesses? Are you kidding me? Now that these "attorneys" have defined a 'witness' as someone Dr. Ford told her story to, there are tens of millions of witnesses all over the U.S. I have a confession. I too have heard Dr. Ford tell her story. Am I too a witness now?
"WOULD HAVE?" -- SJC Chairman asked you to send them, on national TV. Why didn't you, morons?

"Attorneys Debra Katz, Lisa Banks and Michael Bromwich said Ford would have provided the FBI with her medical records and information pertaining to a polygraph exam she took in August."
Commentary: Christine Blasey Ford’s latest stunt sinks any credibility she had left.

Either Ford is complicit in playing games with Kavanaugh's nomination or she is a pawn in the hands of her attorneys (possibly doing their hidden paymasters' bidding).
theblaze.com/news/2018/10/0…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Bansi Sharma
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bansisharma see all

Profile picture
1. "Black Mirror: Bandersnatch"
It is the most hopelessly useless piece of crap in the Netflix series. The inability to fast forward or rewind is annoying as hell, and the interactive decision points are patronizing garbage.
2. I abandoned the sorry episode after about 40 minutes as I found it more boring than filling a form in a physician's office. If this is the entertainment of the future, I would much rather take up darning socks for amusement.
3. Could my dislike of this episode have something to do with the fact that I have zero interest in video games? Having engineered and implemented numerous mission critical software systems worldwide, I find it boring to match wits with mundane software programs.
Read 8 tweets
Profile picture
Only in rabid socialist imaginations anything is free.
-- Public schooling isn't free. People pay through their noses for it in property taxes.
-- Social Security isn't free. It's people's own money taken and returned by govt.
-- VA isn't free. People pay for it through taxes.
As for the cutesy "free of cost at the point of service" goes, all consumer purchases all across the world are also "free of cost at the point of service" when people pay with a credit card. But only the dumbest of the dumb think "free at point of service" is free of cost.
And when the federal govt is running a trillion dollar deficit every year since 2009 (and don't you dare blame tax cuts because revenue went UP because of the tax cuts; deficits are caused by run-away spending), your credit card bills will have to be paid by future generations.
Read 4 tweets
Profile picture
1. 2016 Election: A Liberal Paradox (in a few short tweets)
As you know, I respect and value all voters, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and others alike. I don't have the same view of party leaders though, and I loathe liberal mainstream media partisanship.
2. Now I believe "Russia Interference!" is a cruel hoax played by MSM and Democratic leadership on unsuspecting Democrat voters. Because if it isn't, then it creates a mother of all paradoxes for the Democratic base. Let me explain how.
3. Democratic base has been led to believe:
a) Trump won because ignorant American heartland yahoos voted for him, i.e. Republican voters are dumb, Democratic voters are smart.
b) Thousands of Dem voters were influenced by Russian trolls into voting for Trump or Green Party.
Read 5 tweets

Related threads

Profile picture
Ford ‘Wasn’t Clear’ Committee Offered California Interview in lieu of Public Washington Hearing

@drawandstrike @ThomasWictor @HNIJohnMiller @catesduane @rising_serpent @_ImperatorRex_ @Debradelai @GodlessNZ @almostjingo @tracybeanz @TheChiIIum

judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/rele…
Ford wanted to avoid “media circus” of public hearing, but was unaware of accommodations offered by the Committee to address her concerns
During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday,
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford indicated that she had not been made aware of multiple offers made by Chairman Chuck Grassley to send staff to California to interview her, a format that she said she would have preferred.
Read 17 tweets
Profile picture
(THREAD) The GOP claim that there's no corroboration of Dr. Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her is a lie. Corroborating evidence—evidence that tends to support a proposition—already exists. I'll detail as much of it as I can. I hope you'll read on and RETWEET.
1/ The GOP falsely claims "corroborating evidence" only exists when you have an innocent bystander at the scene of the crime who can later tell law enforcement, "I saw it all." You almost *never* have that sort of evidence in a sex crime—and that's *not* what corroboration means.
2/ Corroboration is any fact that is "probative" with respect to a given proposition—meaning, it tends to *support* a given proposition. Any fact known to law enforcement that tends to support the proposition that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted Dr. Ford is "corroborating evidence."
Read 111 tweets
Profile picture
Sen Feinstein did not leak the letter/ the existence of the letter to the intercept— staff for other Democrats on the committee did. These excerpts make that clear

They cared more about stopping Kavanaugh than protecting Dr. Ford’s request for privacy

theintercept.com/2018/09/12/bre…
Senator Feinstein suggested that Dr Ford’s friends must have leaked it the letter.

But Dr. Ford testified that she did not authorize the release of her letter or provide it to anyone outside of Congresswoman Eshoo, Sen Feinstein, and her attorneys.

townhall.com/tipsheet/laure…
Articles in Buzzfeed, the New York Times, and the New Yorker (published before Dr Ford told her story of her own accord to the Washington Post) made clear that Dr. Ford’s name, contact information, and existence of accusations had been leaked to the media from Democrat offices.
Read 4 tweets
Profile picture
I'm a sociologist who studies adolescent sexual violence. On this thread, I will be live tweeting the #Kavanaugh hearing, chiming in with sociological insights and research findings.
Full disclosure--I will probably step away for parts of it. While many conservatives have cast feminists as people who rejoice at allegations of sexual assault against powerful men, this is a painful process for us. We know survivors. We are survivors. And I will need breaks.
It does not bode well that the beginning of this hearing is starting with equating #Kavanaugh and #Ford's experiences with harassment following Dr. Ford's allegations. They are absolutely not the same.
Read 115 tweets
Profile picture
More inconsistencies with #ChristineBlaseyFord!

The problem with a lie, especially when involving other people, is that it's hard to repeat the lie consistently and have various accounts match up. I will do a deeper thread on the overall #DeepState attack on #JudgeKavanaugh...
which is what the smear campaign really is. Let me outline the items in #Fords' accusations that are either SPECIFIC contradictions or don't match with common sense. I will start with her corroborations:
1. Despite the "party," which was really a small get-together, only...
having five people in attendance (as of her most-recent account), including Ford, NOT ONE of those people identified as being at the event recalls the event. This was not a "typical" event as she claims two men tried to rape her, and she fled the scene without telling her one...
Read 31 tweets
Profile picture
Two nights ago Dr Ford’s legal team sent a long list of demands to Chairman Grassley’s team as conditions under which Dr. Ford is willing to testify.

A few points on that discussion as we wait to hear whether Dr Ford will be willing to testify (thread)

judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/rele…
(Prefaced with the fact that Dr. Ford told her story to the Washington Post on Sunday, and her lawyers went a media blitz on Monday declaring repeatedly that she was ready she willing to testify and “do whatever it takes.”)

One very reasonable request Dr. Ford’s lawyers made was with regard to safety.

Threats against Dr Ford’s family should be investigated and guilty parties should be prosecuted.

The capable and professional Capitol Police will ensure her safety when she visits.
Read 10 tweets

Trending hashtags

#NutShellReport #Kavanaughhearings #USVIA #tRump #StopKavanaugh #EuropeShouldWorry #FBI #IranTransactions #ZTE #committing #RachelMitchell #ReadMore #Ford #SexualAssault #NationalSecurityConcerns #5Gprojects #TeamPatriot #Kavanaugh #Democratic #arrested #POTUS #Extradition #ban #BeAHero #JudgeKavanaugh

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!