Post & Times edit boards both oppose Kavanaugh. Post: “[T]oo many questions remain about his history for senators to responsibly vote ‘yes.’ At the same time, enough has been learned about his partisan instincts that we believe senators must vote ‘no.’”
washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-…
washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-…
Post notes, “We have not opposed a Supreme Court nominee, liberal or conservative, since Robert H. Bork in 1987. We believe presidents are entitled to significant deference ....”
And, NYT: “Judges are human beings, not ideological blank slates, but the American legal system depends on their being fair and open-minded to all who come before them. Judge Kavanaugh failed to show that he can do this, or that he even would want to.” nyti.ms/2BX2BoU
