Profile picture
Kaal Chiron @Kal_Chiron
, 11 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
The 100 eminent Hindus are going to create bad blood for these genuine issues by blaming sangh and modi few months before crucial elections in state and centre are due to happen.
It is a very ill-advised strategy to make Modi chose between backward-castes and UC (by comparing Modi’s prompt actions vis-a-vis SC-ST act amendment with these dhārmik issues) at this time of his tenure.
Many tweeple associated with charter was blaming RSS and Modi for Sabarimala verdict & then alluding to Hindu charter.

If this is really what one wishes, then 2/3 majority is only way ahead. Only person with realistic chance of getting it is NaMo backed by RSS and others like us
Why not do this in May-2019? My objection is purely tactical. Why do it so close deceive battle?

Lets say demands aren’t accepted. Then what? Can we take their support for granted while designing poll strategy? This is the dilemma that created in minds of organizational guys?
Yes. There is no guarantee that Modi will be any more Hindu than he was this term. We can start this pressure on him post that 2019 mile-stone, no?
However, there is absolute guarantee if BJP loses, then UPA3 will be more vile and bring about communal violence bill. And some of the charter guys were talking about meeting Rahul Gandhi with these demands!

I can’t even say foolish because these is really knowledgeable ppl.
Lets model what would happen if they meet Rahul. He being a janeudhari pappu declares immediate support.

Now BJP cannot say this openly and cannot NOT say this openly. Pappu wins by stealing section of Hindu brownie points away from Modi knowing he is going to lose anyways.
In this case if

1. Bjp wins : complete breakdown in relationship of these eminent ideology guys with bjp. Forget anything: loss is of dharma. Because I really believe some of these issues are needed

2 bjp loses : third front with cong support - they will never do it.
Eg. Even if this pvt member bill by Satyapal Singh is passed (by 2022 - thats when we capture RS), it will be challenged by seculars in SC who most probably will strike it down- daring NM to amend constitution. Chandrachud will be CJI then. Game this scenario.
The real question is this : do we want to give NaMo the power to amend constitution (it will be needed for overturning various past and coming judgments)?

If yes - this dissidence needs to stop.

If no - then this was never about Hindutva.
This my real concern. It isn’t the overwhelming numerical superiority that is problem. It is this possibility of creating 20 upper caste NOTArds per booth due to misappropriation of this narrative by BIF that is irritating.

Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Kaal Chiron
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!