Why is Glenn Simpson Invoking the First Amendment?
theepochtimes.com/why-is-glenn-s…
Largely overlooked is that Simpson also invoked his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and freedom of association.
Bruce Ohr recently testified that he met with Simpson prior to the FBI obtaining a FISA warrant on Page.
Simpson previously told Congress he had no contact with Ohr until after the presidential election.
On Aug. 22, 2016, Ohr received an email from Simpson asking “Can u ring.”
It does not, however, protect an individual from testimony concerning other individuals.
“Glenn Simpson has to have a reasonable apprehension of criminal prosecution to validly invoke the Fifth."
"You can’t just invoke the Fifth to avoid answering congressional questions.”
"He will instead invoke his constitutional rights not to testify under the First and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution.”
politico.com/f/?id=00000166…
The Supreme Court touched on this in Barenblatt v United States:
"protections of the First Amendment,… do not afford a witness the right to resist inquiry in all circumstances.”
He also did so during his Nov. 8, 2017, interview before the House Intelligence Committee.
docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG…
Levy: Constitutional and common law privileges, First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, attorney work product doctrine.
Levy: There is a First Amendment privilege to free association and free speech.
Gowdy: How would they limit your client’s ability to answer questions?
"they wouldn’t if the committee agreed that nothing he said would interfere with his ability or the company’s ability to assert that privilege going forward in the investigation as to requests for documents or to other testimony.”
The issue of First Amendment protection first arose during negotiations between Simpson’s lawyer and Grassley in preparation for Simpson’s Senate Judiciary testimony on Aug. 22, 2017.
“Fusion GPS worked with and for its clients in furtherance of its clients’ First Amendment rights to engage in political activity and political speech, to speak anonymously, to associate freely with others and to petition their government.”
“You have requested that Fusion GPS reveal the names of any clients that had retained the company for the purpose of performing opposition research on a major political party candidate for president.”
"Requiring Fusion GPS to produce the requested information and materials would chill the exercise of Fusion GPS’ and its clients’ First Amendment rights; thus, a compulsory process is not warranted here for the information and material now being requested.”
Did other clients or participants remain unnamed?
What activities were these clients engaging in - contractors?
And where might these clients lead investigators?
Simpson’s invocation of the Fifth and First Amendments goes beyond self-incrimination.
/End.