But how about now?
What happens if we look at what's going on now instead of what happened a century and a half ago? If we look at the 2010s instead of the 1860s?
As @fivefifths noted here, the results of that wrongheaded decision have been devastating to minority voting rights. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
Republicans there instituted a series of new voting restrictions that federal courts later struck down as unconstitutional, because they targeted African Americans "with almost surgical precision." thenation.com/article/the-su…
One NC GOP Party county chair bragged -- on camera to @TheDailyShow! -- that the state's voter ID law was meant to keep the ballot from “a bunch of lazy blacks that wants the government to give them everything." nation.time.com/2013/10/25/rep…
As @AriBerman has documented in his tireless work on the subject, there have been GOP campaigns to limit the voting power of minorities across the country. npr.org/2018/10/23/659…
It really sounds like you'd be surprised by a lot of the history in it! amazon.com/Give-Us-Ballot…
As @ProfCAnderson has noted, @BrianKempGA has been one of the more egregious offenders -- restricting the black vote in crude ways to help his own gubernatorial campaign. nytimes.com/2018/08/11/opi…
His restrictions were so egregious a judge ordered him to take remedial law classes: kansas.com/news/politics-…
There's a lot of great work out there on this by journalists if you want to read more.
Here's a recent piece by @JamilSmith, for instance: rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
But right now, on the issue of the Republican record with black voting rights, I'd say the 2010s are a lot more relevant than the 1860s.