By that I mean....interventions aside, who participates, how are opportunities explored/prioritized, rituals?, artifacts?, who "runs" the interventions, etc. ?
Here's what's on my mind.... (1/5)
1) Feedback goes to managers. Managers address. Escalate if required. Managers "own" trying to fix impediments & generally protect teams
2) Team meets quarterly for large-scale retro, prioritizes areas for improvements, forms small work-groups
It's like individuals....there are many ways to "be healthy"... (3/5)
Org 1: A drawn out multi-year battle of the kingdoms
Org 2: Gracefully restructures to meet challenge, high morale
How does your continuous improvement OS work?