,
5 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Some reasons why I have cc’d my personal account (usually bcc) on an email:
- safeguard a copy, suspecting someone will bury, delete, or mischaracterize its content
- creating time stamp in second location
- preserving sequential time line
- documenting failure to respond.
- safeguard a copy, suspecting someone will bury, delete, or mischaracterize its content
- creating time stamp in second location
- preserving sequential time line
- documenting failure to respond.
I would only need to use this bcc strategy if insiders with access to my primary email system were untrusted, and liable to alter or destroy evidence. So it’s a window to state of mind.
Susan Rice’s role would have her highly read-in to any threat posed by the incoming administration. So we have an idea she took it seriously.
Also, it’s described as a cc, rather than bcc. So she wanted to warn the suspects that destroyed emails might exist in 2nd source.
Also, it’s described as a cc, rather than bcc. So she wanted to warn the suspects that destroyed emails might exist in 2nd source.
Using cc THIS time, however, doesn’t mean that she always used cc. Rice could have a long email record created by earlier bccs, with only the final email warning the hostiles. I read it as “remember we know what you’ve done, before you do mar harm.”
*more
