,
4 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Yes, there's a lot of that. People who acknowledged in 2007 or so that the Bush admin misled us into war, but still considered people who warned in 2002 that this was happening shrill and unreliable 1/
People who now admit that the GOP has spent decades exploiting racism to sell plutocratic policies, but remain contemptuous about those who said exactly that in, say 2007 or earlier 2/
And, of course, people who now concede that the obsessive focus on emails and the failure to connect the dots on Trump-Russia were big failures of 2016 campaign coverage, but are still furious at those who pointed it out in real time 3/
There is no sin quite as offensive as challenging conventional wisdom early, and then being proved right 4/
