Labour are now more explicitly admitting that they are not seeking real changes to the backstop but to the political declaration on our future relationship (rather than our divorce)
This matters A LOT. Here's why 👇
1/
[Although there seems some nuance between comments by Geoffrey Donaldson vs @eastantrimmp or @NigelDoddsDUP]
2/
conservativehome.com/platform/2018/…
3/
And DUP have been busy flexing muscle 💪💪💪 and reminding PM how much she relies on them - fair enough
4/
It seems to be to accept backstop - & seek to add a UK-wide customs union on top plus UK wide alignment on certain Single Market rules
Is that really so different from Toriew from DUP's point of view?
5/
6/
And @DUPleader slapped down a story in @thetimes that they were open to a softer Brexit via permanent customs union
7/
That she was obviously to win it derisked anti-Corbyn Labour voting for it
8/
👇
8b/
Or if a couple of Corbyn-critical Labour abstained
Anyway, for now Libs say they won't back a confidence vote (having demanded them before!)
9/
That needs to be taken seriously and the Government are right to prioritise changes around the Backstop
But however much I may or may not dislike the backstop it will not be disappearing entirely
10/
I think this is highly risky for them
They may be sincere in saying they would choose 5 years of Corbyn over a potentially permanent backstop
11/
Of course they would be saying goodbye to bungs, billions, bridges or whatever else Westminster throws their way
And to their first chance in 40 years to hold balance of power
12/
That's a Tory majority
A Tory PM with a majority could grab the easiest solution to the Backstop - throwing Northern Ireland under a proverbial bus - by going back as @EU_Commission sources agree would be possible, to a NI only Backstop
13/
But if DUP give up their chance to have a key role in shaping phase two of Brexit - the future bit - they are surely making it more likely that their voice & that of NI is not heard in those key months
14/
They are not alone in pointing to the profound problems it throws up, including to the Belfast Agreement/GFA itself. See for example Lord Bew's comments or view of UUP
15/
The EU will be loath to listen. But the mess of recent @MichelBarnier Schrödinger's border comments shows the EU don't have their plan clearly worked out either
16/
17/
18/18