I worked at Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary (now Gateway Seminary) from 1996-2007 in multiple departments, so I had a great opportunity to see much of the technical system as a whole. 1/
This means considering many groups w/in the seminary who have particular roles to play and requirements to meet: Trustees, administration, faculty, staff, students, volunteers, visiting contributors (ministers, teachers, preachers), guests. 4/
1. Form of abuse/violence.
2. Survivor ministry dynamics.
3. Systemic abuse identification and transformation. 5/
* Sexual harassment
* Sexual assault
* Child sexual abuse
* Child abuse/negligence
* Domestic violence
* Other forms of violence
* Spiritual abuse, authoritarian leadership 6/
* Abuse & trauma
* Survivor + family support & recovery
* Trauma-informed therapy
* Post-traumatic growth/resilience
* Worldwide issues & statistics of abuse, violence, genocide
* Survivor statistics implications for churches, plants, missions 7/
* Systems, systemic abuse/oppression
* Healthy vs toxic organizational strategies & structures
* Evaluating & revising church/ministry systems
* child safety practices/abuse prevention
* Advocacy for victims & the vulnerable 8/
Trustees & lead administrators need a comprehensive compilation & review of policies/practices *required* of seminary institution by law, by regulatory agencies, & by voluntary associations (e.g., accreditation). 9/
* Legal: local, state, federal laws.
* Regulatory agency requirements: IRS, state attorney general or other corporation/business board.
* Associational requirements: ATS, regional accreditation, specialization or certification requirements. 10/
* Immigration, visa, & other international laws for non-citizen seminary community members.
* Int'l laws re: commission of crimes by non-citizens (e.g., if seminary-related person commits crime while there representing seminary). 11/
* Do ALL current seminary policies & documents accurately reflect ALL sources of policies that are binding on the institution?
* What gaps in required practice documentation need to be updated in constitution, by-laws, resolutions, manuals, etc.? 12/
Trustees & lead administrators need to examine policies & practices related to abuse, violence, disqualified leaders, toxic ministry systems, etc., that are not required as in Item #2, but are crucial to protection/prevention. 13/
Some evaluations require bringing in departmental administrators to assist in compiling current policies, & to help assess whether policy each is: (1) adequate as is, (2) could be improved, or (3) represents a gap to fill. 14/
This represents collaborations w/ outsiders mostly, where seminary can refuse official connection if the individual/institution is not safe.
* Church plant candidates, church plant site endorsement/support
* Institutional advancement - refusal of donations. 15/
* Theological Field Education, and Doctor of Ministry, approvals: ministry site, ministry supervisor, spiritual director, project.
* Continuing education - how best to equip churches & ministries to get up to standards of safety and sustainability. 16/
* Counseling, ministry, spiritual formation/direction: evaluate qualitative degree of conformity to trauma-informed counseling/ministry practices, & evaluate ministry practices for loopholes where toxic people can hijack discipling process. 17/
The seminary needs transparent process to adopt, periodically review, revise, & post institutional regulations, policies, evaluations, certifications, reports, etc. - and make them accessible to relevant groups. 18/
Do you have these?
* Campus safety
* Whistle-blowing
* How to report accusations of abuse/misconduct at any seminary-related function/site
* Safety where minors present
* Donation acceptance/refusal
* Title IX; other applicable regulations. 19/
Are all appropriate pieces in these?
* Seminary website
* Course catalog
* Employee handbook
* HR policies
* Faculty manual
* Accreditation self-studies and reports
* Incorporation & business license documents, updated & filed w/ the incorporating state. 20/
Sorry I misnumbered the tweets. #25-26-27 should be numbered as #24-25-26.