,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
1/ J. Sutton, for en banc CA6, finds "The Supreme Court has never identified a freestanding right to perform abortions." Citing Casey the right is "derivative of the woman’s position." assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5766… 
2/ The court distinguished provision of government subsidies with restrictions on sales of firearms: "all punitive or irrational licensing requirements run the risk of violating a store’s constitutional rights, whether the store sells guns or not"
3/ Dissent by Judge White argues that Teixeira (CA9) supports PP's case. "Even if the store was entirely prevented from selling guns, its customers’ Second Amendment rights would not be infringed"
4/ Judge White is correct about Teixeira, but Teixeira is wrong. There is a deeply-rooted right to sell firearms. I discuss this concept here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
