,
7 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
Is the US actually this red? It all depends on what map you look at. Ken Field's gallery of alternative maps from the 2016 election shows markedly different stories about the state of US politics 👀 1/ wired.trib.al/XgrN3qW
This dasymetric dot density map accounts for population density in a given area. Instead of filling an entire state or county with the color red or blue to indicate which party won, Field uses red and blue dots to represent every vote that was cast 2/ wired.trib.al/XgrN3qW 
The value-by-alpha map uses color and opacity to indicate vote share and population in an area. Bright and vibrant colors show a high vote share in a densely populated area and a light color indicates high vote share in a sparsely populated area 3/ wired.trib.al/XgrN3qW
The choropleth highlights map may be the most insightful of them all. It shows vote share in counties that flipped political parties between the 2012 & 2016 elections. Bright colors convey big margin of victory and lighter shades indicate a narrow one 4/ wired.trib.al/XgrN3qW
This map shows where the vote was the closest. Called the Blended America Map, it uses the Zip Code Tabulation Areas of counties where the 2016 vote came down to + or - 5 percentage points 5/ wired.trib.al/XgrN3qW
You can find out more about Field’s maps and what they say about the 2016 election here: 6/ wired.trib.al/XgrN3qW
Want to get news like this delivered to you directly? Sign up for our daily newsletter: wired.trib.al/Iv67krf
