It's not possible for pundits & partisan actors to have their cake & eat it too
Due to the barrage of biased misinformation about Jody Wilson-Raybould's role as attorney general vs justice minister, it's necessary to explain the basics
This is standard practice in #CDNlaw, so lawyers don't forget details & properly document billable hours
If Jody Wilson-Raybould felt she was acting as solicitor to the govt RE #SNCLavalin, an ethical lawyer would inform the other party that she was recording the call for these purposes at the onset #CDNpoli #CDNlaw
She didn't inform Michael Wernick
Therefore it's difficult to defend Jody Wilson-Raybould RE her call with Michael Wernick that is now widely published
Distributing any call between a lawyer & client, even if that client is the govt, is an absolute breach of trust & #ethics
It was Jody Wilson-Rabould who cited solicitor-client privilege when initially declining to comment on the #SNCLavalinScandal, so much so that she sought advice from a judge on circumventing that confidentiality
What matters is Jody Wilson-Raybould's state of mind (mens rea) at the time she recorded a call with Michael Wernick & she regularly repeated her belief that she was operating under solicitor-client privilege on behalf of the govt client
Therefore Jody Wilson-Raybould is essentially confessing that she recorded Michael Wernick, as part of her govt client party, in a clandestine manner that is contrary to #CDNlaw #ethics obligations
She didn't notify Wernick, the PCO, PMO, or PMJT
To the lay person this sounds reasonable, given that she was caught in a contentious matter with her employer, due to divergent opinions on how to proceed between her & her govt client
But lawyers are held to a higher ethical standard
If every lawyer secretly recorded their clients & published those phone calls to #CDNmedia whenever the client disagreed with the solicitor's advice, we would no longer have #RuleOfLaw or solicitor-client privilege in #CDNlaw
It's indefensible
Just because partisan interests wish to undermine the current govt & prime minister, it doesn't mean the attorney general can distribute secret recordings of her govt client
It doesn't change the rules of #CDNlaw, #Ethics or solicitor-client privilege
PMJT partially waived #CabinetConfidence to let Jody Wilson-Raybould testify, but he never waived solicitor-client privilege as govt's lawyer in the #SNCLavalin matter
The Wernick recording was done by solicitor-client privilege according to JWR
Jody Wilson-Raybould couldn't claim undue political pressure RE #SNCLavalin as the attorney general, if she wasn't approaching the matter via the solicitor-client lens & state of mind
That means she needed to notify Wernick he was being recorded #Ethics
On the other side of the coin, if Jody Wilson-Raybould secretly recorded her convos with Michael Wernick as the justice minister, at the time she engaged in this behaviour it was a breach of #CabinetConfidentiality & employment contract
It doesn't matter that PMJT waived any portion of #CabinetConfidentiality to permit Jody Wilson-Raybould to testify RE #SNCLavalinScandal
What matters is her mind-state when she secretly recorded calls w Michael Wernick prior to waiver
I regret needing to be the voice of reason, but Jody Wilson-Raybould is no shrinking violet & it benefits no one to treat an attorney-general like a damsel in distress in the aftermath
She made deliberate choices to breach #ethics for personal reasons
Either Jody Wilson-Raybould breached #CabinetConfidentiality & employment contract by collecting & distributing secretly recorded calls with her employer
Or she breached #CDNlaw #Ethics by failing to notify Wernick he was being recorded as govt client
It only muddies the facts for personal &/or partisan gain #SNCLavalin #CDNpoli
It gives me no pleasure to criticize a successful, Indigenous woman, but I'd be abandoning my own #ethics if I turned a blind eye just because she's a minority woman
Jody Wilson-Raybould was the master of her own conflict of interest w Wernick
In Jody Wilson-Raybould's defence, if one is possible, there has never been a better reason & example to separate the role of attorney general from justice minister, so these duties can't be confused in contentious matters going forward
It appears Jody Wilson-Raybould was confused between her obligations as solicitor to the govt & justice minister from a personally defensive viewpoint
Whenever she felt her authority challenged, she panicked & cherry-picked which hat to wear
Unfortunately that cherry-picking led to breaching her professional #ethics, whether it was solicitor-client privilege as attorney general or #CabinetConfidentiality as the justice minister, in her relations w Michael Wernick, PCO, PMO & PMJT
The reason Jody Wilson-Raybould's #CDNlaw #Ethics matter beyond political mudslinging is because #SNCLavalin can now claim corruption in its criminal case
It can even sue #CDNpoli for maliciously leaking details to harm its reputation extra-judicially