,
4 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Barr’s carefully worded description of what would constitute a crime related to hacking and dissemination of emails seemed designed to pre-empt something bad in the report.
No person associated with the campaign “illegally participated in the dissimenation or materials.” Did someone participate in dissemination but not underlying hack?
Furthermore, if Barr is trying to put the best spin on things, I wonder if he’s also redacted the underlying report section - because it relates to the Stone trial or ongoing Wiki investigation.
Yep, that section, pages 176-179, is almost completely blacked out. The AG’s spin on it will stand as the only public account of what Mueller found.
