The grounds upon which the objection was brought are as follows:
(b) the 2nd respondent submitted to the 1st Respondent an affidavit containing false information of a fundamental nature in aid of his qualification for the said election.
The above objection is premised upon the provision of section 31(5) and
1.The respondent denies paragraphs 26, 27 and 28 of the Petition and states that beyond the usage for authentication of voter’s card &
These are the paragraphs where the Petitioners alleged that the 2nd Resp in a bid to improperly influence voters, commenced a programme or a scheme called TRADER – MONI, through which Nigerian electorate,
The 2nd respondent avers as follows:
1.The respondent denies paragraphs 368, 369, 370, 371 and 372 of the petition in their entirety and avers that there was no influence
3.Furthermore, the respondent asserts that Trader-Moni is one of the many social investment schemes to empower petty traders with a budgetary provision as provided in the Appropriation Act
In response to paragraph 111 above, the 2ND RESPONDENT avers as follows:
i.Respondent denies any blood relationship with Mrs. Amina Zakari, contrary
14.Contrary to the assertions in paragraph 367 of the Petition, the respondent asserts that there was no undue advantage given to him by virtue of any Mrs. Amina Zakari or anyone else being assigned to undertake a national responsibility.