Thread by @GTS_Watch

1/ Today, John Solomon reports on the concerns of State Dept official Kathleen Kavalec regarding the accuracy of Christopher Steele's report. I find it notable that the State Dept was involved in vetting Steele's credibility, but Solomon scoots over that.
thehill.com/opinion/white-…

2/ Specifically, Kavalec wrote a typed memo on October 11, 2016. This was a week and a half before the Carter Page FISA

3/ On the very same day (10-11-2016), Strzok texted Page that he was fighting with Stu Evans over a FISA, presumably the FISA for Carter Page.

“Currently fighting with Stu for this FISA” – Full text thehill.com/opinion/campai…

4/ Kavalec was concerned about Steele’s veracity, but it’s not entirely clear what Evans’ concerns were.

POSSIBILITES:
1.Steele’s veracity (same as Kavalec)
2.Steele’s bias
3.Something else

5/ On October 12, 2016, Lisa Page texted Andrew McCabe. Page stated that there was a “robust explanation” of Steele’s bias, but Stu Evans still had concerns. foxnews.com/politics/fbi-c…

6/ Strangely, Lisa Page texted Andy McCabe on October 14, 2016 about providing some sort of “unredacted production” to “the Hill” if the State Dept. doesn’t raise concerns. I don’t know what that item would be; Congress wouldn’t see a FISA, right?

7/ Here is the set of October 12-14, 2016 texts between Lisa Page and Andy McCabe as published by Fox News.

scribd.com/document/40277…

8/ In contrast to the story told by Adam Schiff, there were tons of blinking red lights all over the place (State Dept., Dep. Asst. Atty Gen. Stu Evans) warning that Steele's info was problematic. As we all know, the FBI applied for and received a FISA warrant for Carter Page

end