(A thread)
Now there’s two ways you can use the debt:
- As a consumer (buy a car)
- As a produce (start a profit making enterprise or buy a profit making asset)
Also as a consumer trapped in status competition, profit making enterprises will make you salivate for more debt in future.
By helping increase prices via debt-driven purchases, you make things expensive for future generations.
There are only limited seats in Harvard and everyone wants it.
Status competition —> debt —> slogging.
That sounds reasonable until you think how profit is generated.
Someone else has to take debt to pay for your profits.
(That someone else could be people or nature).
However those increased earnings don’t come from nowhere. If you are paid higher, it is because you are helping profits accumulate to someone, which is then lent out to consumers again.
The majority of population lives hand to mouth, or even in debt.
In fact, the profit accumulation insurance against slogging works only if someone else slogs on their behalf.
“Cross-country differences in wealth inequality seem better explained by social expenditures and debt take-up than by demographic factors and the labour market”
oxfordscholarship.com/mobile/view/10…
Short answer: either slog yourself or be in a position to make someone else slog
If you find this distasteful, know that as a society, we have an option to question status and consumption-driven economic progress
That’s it
It’s not the world who owes debt, it is the people, governments, and corporations that owe debt to profit-accumulators.
And after one dies post a lifetime of slogging, the burden of debt is passed to the next generation.
That’s why poor nations remain poor.
Our economic system is intimately tied to the philosophy we adopt and values we embrace.
Perhaps in future consuming less will become cool again.
Perhaps rich will start paying back the debt to nature that’s provided them with things for “free”.
You can also watch this documentary: money as debt