, 9 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
The central tenet of the pro-life movement is that an unborn child — from conception — should have the same protections as a person who has already been born; no more, no less. That is why #EqualityForAll is inconsistent with the notion that #AbortionIsAWomansRight /1
If so, no unborn child should be killed absent a legal justification that would otherwise apply to the killings of persons already born. /2
For example, I would be legally justified to kill another person who is an immediate threat to my life. That would be self-defense. Similarly, a mother who has an ectopic pregnancy, for example, would be justified in aborting her pregnancy since her very life depends upon it. /3
However, in the case of rape or incest, there is no comparable legal justification for #abortion. If a mother cannot kill, let’s say, her six-year-old son simply because his father is a rapist, then why should she be allowed to kill her unborn child for the same reason? /4
The trivial answer is that a rape victim should not be punished by having to bear a child. Admittedly, childbearing is very inconvenient for the mother-no doubt. But does nine-months’ worth of inconvenience justify taking 70- or 80-years’ worth of life from a child? /5
Beyond this, even if the father is a brutal rapist of the worst order, unless he confesses to the crime or cops a quick plea deal, he won’t go on trial for at least nine months in most jurisdictions. So why should the child be killed faster than the rapist is punished? /6
If we allow abortion in cases of rape, we would create a special justification that is not available in other cases of homicide. So by having a rape exception, we validate the subjective notion that the value of unborn human life is in the eye of the beholder. /7
It’s this subjective valuation of human life that cheapens it. So if we want genetically-distinct human life to remain valuable at all stages of existence — we must maintain objective standards at all times and for all reasons. /8
Therefore, innocent human life in the womb should not be killed for any reason except to protect the life of the mother. Any other reason is a subjective devaluation of human life. /end
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Matt Wilson
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!