,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Pro-life rhetorical strategy is worthy of its own thread
I've thought for a while that the pro-life movement was shooting itself in the foot
They were relying on DISGUST at the expense of RIDICULE
I've thought for a while that the pro-life movement was shooting itself in the foot
They were relying on DISGUST at the expense of RIDICULE
When I was in college, the pro-life tables always had these disgusting images
The theory, I suppose, is that one would be disgusted by the barbarity and motivated to join their cause
The effect is the exact opposite - associating disgusting images with the pro-life movement
The theory, I suppose, is that one would be disgusted by the barbarity and motivated to join their cause
The effect is the exact opposite - associating disgusting images with the pro-life movement
better to use RIDICULE when possible
in 2019 the pro-choice position articulated by Northam - and most of the Democratic candidates - is RIDICULOUS
So stuff like this should work better
in 2019 the pro-choice position articulated by Northam - and most of the Democratic candidates - is RIDICULOUS
So stuff like this should work better
This is heavily influenced by @ScottAdamsSays, who made the point perfectly when Carly Fiorina made the DISGUST mistake
blog.dilbert.com/2015/09/17/car…
blog.dilbert.com/2015/09/17/car…
