,
10 tweets,
5 min read
Read on Twitter
Tell me more about the Sky News crew being deliberately targeted amid medium-range combat when the BMP they were filming belonged to HTS which proves they were on the same grounds as them.
You think those numbers mean nothing? So this is what it's come down to huh?
You think those numbers mean nothing? So this is what it's come down to huh?
middleeasteye.net/news/charities…
HTS is designated as terrorist organization by the UK. Official government document can be viewed here: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
page 8, at the very bottom.
HTS is designated as terrorist organization by the UK. Official government document can be viewed here: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
page 8, at the very bottom.
And as a closing note: If anyone had actually watched BAK's video, they'd see that he stated the BMP "was just hit, you can look around this is all fresh, it was just hit..."
Meaning that Sky News was filming in this same moment. As if the smoke wasn't obvious enough.
Meaning that Sky News was filming in this same moment. As if the smoke wasn't obvious enough.
This thread deserves a bonus round.
>filming a Rebel on a bike at the start
>cameraman says the BMP is being targeted
>BAK says 23mm isn't targeting them
>only one of the crew is labeled as "PRESS" who I'm pretty sure is their producer and not a reporter
>filming a Rebel on a bike at the start
>cameraman says the BMP is being targeted
>BAK says 23mm isn't targeting them
>only one of the crew is labeled as "PRESS" who I'm pretty sure is their producer and not a reporter
Not to mention, she finishes the video by literally interviewing the commander of the HTS counteroffensive. Did Sky News finally give up on the "moderate Rebels" gimmick? Why no FSA interviews, why HTS knowing that they're a terrorist organization?
The Rebel on the bike, I mentioned specifically because it shows that the movement of HTS fighters was still being facilitated at the moment of filiming. How do we know that terrorist wasn't the one being targeted?
She says they filmed at a hill "overlooking" Kafr Nabudah.
She says they filmed at a hill "overlooking" Kafr Nabudah.
Another thing I'm curious about is how at no point did Alex's crew manage to film the drone she claimed was stalking them. Nevermind the "Tank shells" contradiction.
Wouldn't footage of the drone have been a key part of the story to prove they were "deliberately targeted"?
Wouldn't footage of the drone have been a key part of the story to prove they were "deliberately targeted"?
Speaking of which, this Sky News interview was done at the end when they fell back. I'm pretty sure that bomb that hit the red soil was filmed at the start of BAK's edited video.
35.4170341, 36.5497971
35.4170341, 36.5497971
I can't help but think that these people over at Sky News are being used as human shields to protect commanders in the field. This is a tragedy waiting to unfold if Alex and her crew don't leave Idlib and her employers hold full responsibility.
They even went to the same HTS staging area, ridiculous.
