All the time you hear how stocks have historically returned more than real estate. I'm not going to write a large thread on this topic right now (maybe enxt weekend from London), but I want to touch up on it quickly.
1. Appreciation in price
2. Cash flow (dividends)
That's it. And they are usually not as tax efficient.
1. Property appreciation
2. Forced appreciation
3. Cash flow (rent)
4. Mortgage debt pay down
5. Depreciation & other tax benefits
6. Negotiations
You cannot do this as a stock investor unless you're a billionaire activist or private equity fund with billions like KKR.
US real estate yields are usually far higher than dividend yields.
S/he is paying your mortgage down (paying bank's interest & reducing mortgage owed). What you see is your equity growing.
Real estate is the MOST tax efficient asset available.
In real estate you bet your bottom dollar, it's all about negotiating. if you're good at it, you could earn another 10% just for talking the talk.
If this real estate goes up 3.5% per annum and pays you only $500 per month in net cash flow. What is your return on investment?
$17,500 profit in price appreciation
$6,000 profit in net cash flow
$7,500 increase in equity via debt paydown
$??? in depreciation & tax incentives
You're looking at least 31% IRR (internal rate of return). Now imagine, you renovate this property by investing your cash flow and increase its valuation by 15% or more.
Now imagine you negotiate another extra 7.5% as you deal with potential buyers, who end up overpaying.
Meanwhile, stock index investors are hoping for another 9% return.
Forget the extreme frugality, FIRE and 40-year passive indexing. You're losing time & leaving money on the table for guys like me!