Thread by @csranga

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @getmesomelatte @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke And current SC interpretation of same Constitution of Bharat is that they have no fundamental rights
thehindu.com/news/national/…

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke Whether Hindu Deities under our Constitution have fundamental rights or not is the fundamental question. @utkarsh_aanand
news18.com/news/india/sc-…

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand “Ayodhya is one of the places of ‘Pilgrimage’ for Hindus. It is the very life of Hindus for which at the appropriate time they derive attainment of ‘Moksha’ (salvation)… The right to life they humbly pray is not to be deprived of”.

Lord Sri Rama to SC.

indianexpress.com/article/india/…

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand "It is true that life in its expanded horizons today includes all that give meaning to a man’s life including his tradition, culture and heritage and protection of that heritage in its full measure would certainly come within the encompass of an expanded concept of Article 21" SC

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand In Ramsharan Autyanuprasi & Anr vs Union of India & Ors on 14 November, 1988 Equivalent citations: 1989 AIR 549

The above representation of Lord Sri Rama to SC should be read along with the above expanded definition of right to life u Art 21 which is right to Moksha of Hindus.

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand Hindu Deity Rights a common thread that connects three important Hindu Temple judgements awaited by Devotee community.
Ayodhya , Sabarimala and Padmnabha Swamy

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1087178046568685570

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः
The correct Constitutional position is that Hindu Deities of Bharat have same pre-independence ancient Right to Life & Liberty and Art 21 only recognizes this as per ratio of Justice Khanna's ADM Jabalpur judgement upheld by a nine judge bench of SC recently.

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand धर्म एव हतो हन्ति धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः ।
तस्माद् धर्मो न हन्तव्यो मा नो धर्मो हतोऽवधीत् ॥

If we protect Dharma it will protect us if we don't then we will be destroyed

Therefore SC has to give a judgement as per its ancient principle यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः

hindustantimes.com/india-news/ram…

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand SC itself has quoted in a judgement ancient principle of justice in Bharat "In the adharma flowing from wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges and the ruler"

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1065791053976952832

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand The SC has to recognize the historical fact that Of all many countless destroyed temples in thousand years a Hindu Deity has chosen to exercise His fundamental rights through a spiritual 92+ year old Sr advocate in only the Ayodhya Ramjanmabhoomi case

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand No one has a right to speak for Hindu Deities of the destroyed temples. What the other Hindu Deities do in future should be left to their wisdom by SC as they alone are the owners of the temples and they are not party to the Ayodhya case.

@vihanaary @davidfrawleyved @AhmAsmiYodha @Sanjay_Dixit @anuraag_saxena @gopugoswami @Aabhas24 @Payal_Rohatgi @madhukishwar @mariawirth1 @DostKhan_Jammu @SureshChavhanke @utkarsh_aanand Lord Sri Rama coincidentally also intervened in Dakshina Ayodha temple case to rescue his devotee Bhaktha Ramadasu who was imprisoned for 12 years for using tax payers money to construct His temple & a Muslim Ruler respected the wishes of the Hindu Deity.

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1184519260883709952