"In December 2018, defendant Amber Laura Heard published an op-ed calling for 'changes to laws and rules and social norms' so that women who come forward to talk about violence receive more support."
Amber Heard (AH) and her team state the defamation lawsuit itself is ironic in that it is sought by a powerful man accused of domestic violence trying to 'silence' his accuser when the whole point of the article is that women need more protection coming forward.
Maybe they think JD is saying the opposite of what he means in his complaints in the suit? I doubt this too. They seem to be taking his accusations very seriously, even responding with 282 pages of testimony and exhibits to 'prove' AH's allegations are true.
Let's break that down.
She first denied him his constitutional rights under ammendment VI: the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury
But that's legal. She dropped the charges and legally agreed to stop discussing them publicly.