,
13 tweets,
5 min read
Read on Twitter
Now what common goal could unite so diverse and often antagonistic human beings all around the world?
Yep, I’d say survival will do -it’s in our genes after all.
Yep, I’d say survival will do -it’s in our genes after all.
Side note: Get ready for an extensive, global trashing propaganda about this. But that shouldn’t scare you from joining the million “extremists” who think that the life of so many (including non-human) beings matters more than the profits of a few c****.
Money poured into dividing us &screwing democracies/alliances strong enough to enact regulations that big corps/millionaires can't escape
-Tax dodging ("Let's say welfare, healthcare aso are too expensive instead)
-"Death corps" (tobacco, food)
-This 👇
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
-Tax dodging ("Let's say welfare, healthcare aso are too expensive instead)
-"Death corps" (tobacco, food)
-This 👇
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
And here is a quick example of global trashing propaganda I was refering to above.
Lies are all they have.
#ClimateStrikes
United We Stand.
Lies are all they have.
#ClimateStrikes
United We Stand.
Here is another example -From a Tufton Street guy (what were the odds? -Yes, that's ironic.)
Now how are Koch&friends' mouthpieces going to trash the mobilisation of millions all over the world defending the right to have a future?
Quick analysis.
Now how are Koch&friends' mouthpieces going to trash the mobilisation of millions all over the world defending the right to have a future?
Quick analysis.
1st move: Try to scare people into thinking "climate justice" would translate into: "Making you poorer".
When that this means is "Asking the people responsible for this to pay" 👇
But what about the persons suffering the most of climate change? They're not the 1s who benefited the most from its origin &will need help.
💡!
Tax dodgers' taxes can pay for this.
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
But what about the persons suffering the most of climate change? They're not the 1s who benefited the most from its origin &will need help.
💡!
Tax dodgers' taxes can pay for this.
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
2nd move: Try to convince people that it's not possible to change.
Well let's invest Oil&Gas funding/dodged taxes in renewables & in 0 carb techs (artificial leaves producing fuel that can be used in existing cars, graphene, alternatives to rare earths...)
Well let's invest Oil&Gas funding/dodged taxes in renewables & in 0 carb techs (artificial leaves producing fuel that can be used in existing cars, graphene, alternatives to rare earths...)
The only losers here will be the huge Oil&Gas companies currently about to drill the arctic, and tax dodgers.
Note to Tufton Street guy: They are not funding us, on the contrary they are helping their funders not to contribute to our societies - so actually they can f*** off.
Note to Tufton Street guy: They are not funding us, on the contrary they are helping their funders not to contribute to our societies - so actually they can f*** off.
3rd move: Explain that the best way to save the Earth is to trust the people that basically screwed it in the first place, and that the false solution meaning profits for them are the way to go.
And anyone else saying otherwise is a dangerous extremist.
And anyone else saying otherwise is a dangerous extremist.
And here comes the master move: Now how is Robert going to manage to make this 👇 look bad?
"Evil socialism"!
Well of course.
The thing with these Tufton street guys is they only have one "argument" in the end:
If we were to get a more equal, united, fair and environmental-friendly society (bad for their funders!), this would be hell on Earth.
Well of course.
The thing with these Tufton street guys is they only have one "argument" in the end:
If we were to get a more equal, united, fair and environmental-friendly society (bad for their funders!), this would be hell on Earth.
As, you know what?
It's possible, and wld bypass the profit-makers in the current status quo.
So said funders have good reasons to fear a society where energy could be locally-produced, GM wldn't be needed &people wldn't struggle in poverty-then cld think.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
It's possible, and wld bypass the profit-makers in the current status quo.
So said funders have good reasons to fear a society where energy could be locally-produced, GM wldn't be needed &people wldn't struggle in poverty-then cld think.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
