Profile picture
, 10 tweets, 7 min read Read on Twitter
‘Lies are being pedalled’ to our children on climate change:

Sea levels are not rising
Earth is getting greener
Extreme weather events are declining
Crop yields are increasing
The Maldives are not underwater
Number of Polar Bears is increasing
...
So since Greta Thunberg's performance at the UN the other week, I asked a couple of "Leftie" friends (Bernie Sanders / Corbyn supporters) on twitter who I consider pretty "woke" what they thought about the Man Made Global Warming Theory.

They both immediately said "It's a Hoax".
There does seem to be a LOT of people out there, who know the "Climate Models", on which all the IPCC reports are based on, are NOT science & based on 100% false premises & assumptions, while deliberately 100% ignoring non man made causes - such as the SUN.

They KNOW it's a SCAM
The IPCC claim that:
"97% of Climate Change scientists agree that man is primarily responsible for the rise in temperatures over the last 50-100 years"

is complete BUNKUM.

No Climate Emergency say 500 Scientists to UN
How the IPCC arrived at their 100% Fraudulent Claim that "97% of scientists agree with the man made Global Warming Theory" is explained in this excellent article:

Report Sheds Light On The Rockefeller Family’s Covert “Climate Change” Plan
activistpost.com/2019/08/report…
How the "Davos Elites" expect to make TRILLIONS of dollars from the Man Made Global Warming Hoax.

Watch this excellent 10 minute presentation explaining the scam:
pscp.tv/w/1yoKMBMPeNnG…
This is a SCIENTIFIC method of modelling the climate.
The IPCC Climate Change "models" don't do anything like this at all.

For temperatures to rise, "Energy In" must be greater than "Energy Out".

These models show Energy In = Energy Out, so temperatures are currently stable.
My own research since 2000/2002 on the Science of Climate Change.

The Anthropogenic (man made) Climate Change Myth
ian56.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-an…
Compelling evidence on a true primary cause of Climate Change.

Prof. Henrik Svensmark on "The connection between the Sun, Cosmic Rays, Percentage of Cloud Cover, and Climate Change"
Here's a good question for people who haven't started thinking for themselves on Climate Change:

Which of these previous predictions of "Climate Catastrophe" came true?
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Ian56
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!