This is such an appalling article in the @guardian that you would think @Kate_M_Proctor and @mwolferobinson would be embarrassed to put their names to it. 1/ 
Since when has democracy been anti-feminist? There is no evidence whatsoever that trigger ballots have been motivated by some male conspiracy, or by the equally nonsense allegation of antisemitism 2/
This non-article, of which both so-called journalists have done no external research for whatsoever, contains no evidence or corroboration at all. What then is the point of it, except to to produce an anti-Labour headline? 3/
If either of them had done any research, they would have quickly found out that the majority of new members of the Labour party are women. Perhaps Google is beyond them? 4/
Perhaps they didn't know there has been a longitudinal study of the membership of the Labour party. 'Women make up a greater proportion of the new members than of the older members (52% to 38%).' 5/ blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpol…
So basically they are reporting that women are conspiring against women in the Labour party, which is such nonsense that it would have killed this article stone dead 6/
I noticed this story was picked up #r4today were a woman was bullied by man to make the false claim that women are bullied by men. If you want a classic guess of 'fake news' and media bias, then you might add this to your collection. These journalists must be really proud. 7/
