All 7 billion of us can enjoy high-energy lives while *reducing* our impact on the environment
But only if we Stand Up for Nuclear!
Join us in making history this Sunday in one of 33 cities around the world!
And please share!
❤️✊🏼
standupfornuclear.org
Nuclear has the smallest environmental footprint *by far*
environmentalprogress.org/the-complete-c…
They are in the grip of a dystopian fervor that has nothing to do with the environment or climate change
The *only* Green New Deals that work are with nuclear, not renewables
forbes.com/sites/michaels…
Terrific TV segment on @Nuclear_Pride by @BNNBloomberg
bnnbloomberg.ca/video/~1807668
Come & talk to us!
*All* are welcome at Nuclear Stand Ups:
- pro-nuclear, anti-nuclear
- alarmists, lukewarmers, skeptics
- Dems, Reps
- conservatives, liberals
- Leftists, Rightists
- People who hate labels
I’ll be Paris — come say hi!
🤝✌️✋
“In order to achieve the climate goals, taboo topics must also be on the agenda.”
🙌
Keep the faith, everyone, it’s gonna happen!
handelsblatt.com/meinung/kommen…
“Chill winds blow for Renewables”
“Local opposition has become biggest block for wind & other renewables... the most common grounds for complaint in Germany is the protection of birds and bats, which can be endangered by wind turbines”
dw.com/en/has-the-win…
Our positive action sharply contrasts to the apocalyptic & violent behavior of @ExtinctionR in London
Here's why atomic humanism will triumph over climate apocalypse — please share!
environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2019/…
Britain is already in a transition to low-carbon energy
It receives 20% of its power from nuclear, 11% from wind, 4% from solar, and 39% from natural gas. Just 5% came from coal last year.
forbes.com/sites/michaels…
When commuters demanded to know why he was blocking the technology XR activists say they want, the man said, “Why on earth do we want economic growth when we are using 1.7 Earths?”
His claim is based on the scientifically-discredited work of “Earth Overshoot Day” and the “Ecological Footprint” organization I and others debunked.
forbes.com/sites/michaels…
By working in cities and growing more food on less land, humans move away from the poverty of small farmer life, which involves the use of wood as fuel, which destroys forests.
But XR made it abundantly clear it isn't interested in saving nature or lifting everyone out of poverty.
But in this case, the supposed “utopia” XR and Thunberg are demanding is of low-energy agrarian poverty.
Nor do most people want to keep wood fuel-using developing nations trapped in poverty.
Instead, they called the near-fatal incident a “mistake” implying the problem was merely tactical.
It wasn’t.
forbes.com/sites/michaels…