1) You keep being a fucking idiot multiple times in one tweet, so I find it doubly hard to take you seriously.
First off, impeachment includes the trial. To be 'impeached' in the sense you're talking about is the same as being indicted. It sounds scary w/o the conviction?
First off, impeachment includes the trial. To be 'impeached' in the sense you're talking about is the same as being indicted. It sounds scary w/o the conviction?
2) That's right, I'm going to come out and say this now, to dispel any false notions of what I believe and have interpreted upon ACTUALLY READING THE FUCKING PROCESS, unlike this witless fucking tick.
Bill Clinton was acquitted. As such, to say he was impeached is meaningless.
Bill Clinton was acquitted. As such, to say he was impeached is meaningless.
3) For me to hurl my shoe at his head would have more political and legal ramifications against him than a thousand articles of impeachment retroactively passing against Bill Clinton, if they were all acquitted in the Senate.
4) It is not a stretch, and is actually well founded and often said, that the 'impeachment' proceedings against Bill Clinton buoyed his and the Dems flagging support, as instead of taking him to task for a nuclear China, outright corruption in Africa, and thwarting SA democracies
5) The Republicans passed impeachment articles about him lying about an affair with his staffer, a charge that should be roundly marked given how many staffers were no doubt similarly mistreated by the same people leveling it.
Again, with the senate acquittal, it HELPED the Dems
Again, with the senate acquittal, it HELPED the Dems
6) Because of this framing that you now use, you institutionalized toadstool, that 'impeachment' is just the House and the Senate trial is a separate matter, the Republicans emasculated and neutered their party, leaving them as a vestigial organ in politics and leading to Obama.
7) Because they claimed and trumpeted their pyrrhic victory of impeachment, not only did they struggle to maintain majorities for Bush's term in office leading to the disastrous bipartisan horsefuckery of things like No Child Left Behind, but they became so weak OBAMA won TWICE.
8) Their and YOUR proclamations of impeachment by the House being the only aspect of the proceedings that matter, that to pass something by simple majority in the House is all it takes to impeach, is the farce that allows that bloated corpse on stilts Hillary to still be relevant
9) Impeachment is, because you apparently need to have it spelled out for you due to the environmental dumbfuckery that has eroded your ability to seek out knowledge for yourself to see what a goddamn farce the world is, can be summed up as this:
10) The House indicts, with the indictment being laid out in articles of impeachment.
House lawyers then go to the Senate, where they need a 2/3 majority to. 67 Senators. PERIOD. END OF FUCKING STORY.
The House could impeach Trump tomorrow on having 2 scoops of ice cream.
House lawyers then go to the Senate, where they need a 2/3 majority to. 67 Senators. PERIOD. END OF FUCKING STORY.
The House could impeach Trump tomorrow on having 2 scoops of ice cream.
11) BUT BEHOLD THE NUMBER OF FUCKS THAT IT WOULD AMOUNT TO:
12) That's what you call 'impeachment'.
A field of absolutely fuck all nothing.
Because I talk about the Senate trial as the real proceedings, though, you say that you can't take me seriously, because you want everyone to focus on the field that lacks in all the fucks.
A field of absolutely fuck all nothing.
Because I talk about the Senate trial as the real proceedings, though, you say that you can't take me seriously, because you want everyone to focus on the field that lacks in all the fucks.
13) I'm going to block you now, because I hate you. With a primal fury, I DESPISE you. This thread you may consider me 'taking you seriously', but you should not be mistaken by this false notion. I simply believe that it is right and proper to display how much I DESPISE idiocy.
/end
